These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36216590)

  • 1. Random-effects meta-analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data-generating models: A simulation study.
    Jansen K; Holling H
    Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2200132. PubMed ID: 36216590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 29973146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beta-binomial model for meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1715-1734. PubMed ID: 28124446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies.
    Felsch M; Beckmann L; Bender R; Kuss O; Skipka G; Mathes T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):319. PubMed ID: 36514000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitfalls of using the risk ratio in meta-analysis.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):398-419. PubMed ID: 30854785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring consequences of simulation design for apparent performance of methods of meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Hoaglin DC; Bakbergenuly I
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1667-1690. PubMed ID: 34110941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Network meta-analysis of rare events using the Mantel-Haenszel method.
    Efthimiou O; Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Higgins JPT; Egger M; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(16):2992-3012. PubMed ID: 30997687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study.
    Beisemann M; Doebler P; Holling H
    Biom J; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1597-1630. PubMed ID: 32510177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applications of simple and accessible methods for meta-analysis involving rare events: A simulation study.
    Hodkinson A; Kontopantelis E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1589-1608. PubMed ID: 34139915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of hypothesis tests for homogeneity in meta-analysis with focus on rare binary events.
    Zhang C; Wang X; Chen M; Wang T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):408-428. PubMed ID: 34231330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.
    Pedroza C; Truong VTT
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of Effect Heterogeneity in Rare Events Meta-Analysis.
    Holling H; Jansen K; Böhning W; Böhning D; Martin S; Sangnawakij P
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1081-1102. PubMed ID: 35133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.
    Chen Y; Hong C; Ning Y; Su X
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 26303591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data-generating models of dichotomous outcomes: Heterogeneity in simulation studies for a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Pateras K; Nikolakopoulos S; Roes K
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1115-1124. PubMed ID: 29230852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.