197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36217147)
1. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations' survival in primary molars: 2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Moro BLP; Tedesco TK; Freitas RD; Pássaro AL; Garbim JR; Oliveira R; Mendes FM; ; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):440. PubMed ID: 36217147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients.
Miao C; Yang X; Wong MC; Zou J; Zhou X; Li C; Wang Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD009858. PubMed ID: 33998662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of rubber dam in the survival of RMGIC restorations in primary molars: a 30-month randomized controlled clinical trial.
Brum VDS; Borges MLV; Santos NMD; Kaufmann C; Rodrigues JA
Braz Oral Res; 2024; 38():e009. PubMed ID: 38198308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations.
Raskin A; Setcos JC; Vreven J; Wilson NH
Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11000319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients.
Wang Y; Li C; Yuan H; Wong MC; Zou J; Shi Z; Zhou X
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 9(9):CD009858. PubMed ID: 27648846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of cervical restorations on the periodontal tissues: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.
Favetti M; Montagner AF; Fontes ST; Martins TM; Masotti AS; Jardim PDS; Corrêa FOB; Cenci MS; Muniz FWMG
J Dent; 2021 Mar; 106():103571. PubMed ID: 33385534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth.
Franzon R; Opdam NJ; Guimarães LF; Demarco FF; Casagrande L; Haas AN; Araujo FB
J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26231301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations.
Keys W; Carson SJ
Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 28338026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial.
Sharma H; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A; Kotian H
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2023 Jun; 24(3):301-311. PubMed ID: 36947344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does operatory field isolation influence the performance of direct adhesive restorations?
Daudt E; Lopes GC; Vieira LC
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Feb; 15(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 23534003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do composite restorations in primary molar teeth have a higher survival rate following total or selective caries removal?
Goldsmith R; Taylor G; Waterhouse P
Evid Based Dent; 2021 Jan; 22(1):38-39. PubMed ID: 33772134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival.
Smales RJ
Br Dent J; 1993 May; 174(9):330-3. PubMed ID: 8484999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of different restorative treatments for deep caries lesion in primary teeth (CEPECO 1) - study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.
da Silva GSQ; Raggio DP; Machado GFR; Mello-Moura ACV; Gimenez T; Floriano I; Tedesco TK
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30621659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
