177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36217587)
1. [Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion].
Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 36217587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion.
Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
Prog Orthod; 2020 May; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32363550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.
Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Chiqueto K; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36202696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
Janson G; Caffer Dde C; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Neves LS
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 15529492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
