These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36219006)

  • 1. The Supreme Court's New Direction and the Public's Health.
    Auerbach JN; Sharfstein JM
    JAMA Health Forum; 2022 Jul; 3(7):e222978. PubMed ID: 36219006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A decade-long longitudinal survey shows that the Supreme Court is now much more conservative than the public.
    Jessee S; Malhotra N; Sen M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(24):e2120284119. PubMed ID: 35666873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Constitution and the Public's Health: The Consequences of the US Supreme Court's Medicaid Decision in
    Sunkara V; Rosenbaum S
    Public Health Rep; 2016 Nov; 131(6):844-846. PubMed ID: 28123233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Institutional hybridity and policy-motivated reasoning structure public evaluations of the Supreme Court.
    Gadarian SK; Strother L
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294525. PubMed ID: 37992008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's COVID-Free Exercise Cases.
    Parmet WE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2021; 49(4):564-579. PubMed ID: 35006053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public Carry versus Public Health - The Harms to Come from the Supreme Court's Decision in
    Ulrich MR
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Oct; 387(14):1245-1247. PubMed ID: 36193944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Public Good on the Docket - The Supreme Court's Evolving Approach to Public Health.
    Sharfstein JM; Gostin LO
    N Engl J Med; 2024 May; 390(18):1637-1639. PubMed ID: 38657241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court Is Harming Public Health and the Environment.
    Gostin LO; Wetter S
    JAMA; 2023 May; 329(18):1549-1550. PubMed ID: 37000439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.
    Pomeranz JL
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 30676798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions.
    Vernick JS; Rutkow L; Webster DW; Teret SP
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Nov; 101(11):2021-6. PubMed ID: 21940936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jacobson v Massachusetts: it's not your great-great-grandfather's public health law.
    Mariner WK; Annas GJ; Glantz LH
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Apr; 95(4):581-90. PubMed ID: 15798113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The US Supreme Court's Rulings on Large Business and Health Care Worker Vaccine Mandates: Ramifications for the COVID-19 Response and the Future of Federal Public Health Protection.
    Gostin LO; Parmet WE; Rosenbaum S
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(8):713-714. PubMed ID: 35061000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When the First Amendment and public health collide: the Court's increasingly strict constitutional scrutiny of health regulations that restrict commercial speech.
    Rauer S
    Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(4):690-712. PubMed ID: 23356100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preserving diversity in healthcare after the US Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling.
    Yang YT; Sudarshan S
    BMJ; 2023 Jul; 382():1691. PubMed ID: 37479230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anniversary of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Garn J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Jan; 126(6):S151-2. PubMed ID: 11665215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A road map through the supreme court's back alley.
    Forsythe CD; Kehr BN
    Issues Law Med; 2018; 33(2):175-205. PubMed ID: 30831011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court's influence on medicine and health: the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2005.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2005 Oct; 294(13):1685-7. PubMed ID: 16204668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of the Supreme Court's affirmative action decision on underrepresented populations and dermatology.
    Trepanowski N; Grant-Kels JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Dec; 89(6):1320-1321. PubMed ID: 37579841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Citizens United, public health, and democracy: the Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action.
    Wiist WH
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 101(7):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21421946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.