130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36219172)
1. Reduced Adenoma Miss Rate With 9-Minute vs 6-Minute Withdrawal Times for Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Trial.
Zhao S; Song Y; Wang S; Wang R; Feng Z; Gong A; Yang X; Pan P; Yao D; Zhang J; Zhu Y; Li T; Bi J; Ren X; Tang X; Li Q; Yu D; Zheng J; Song B; Wang P; Chen W; Shang G; Xu Y; Xu P; Lai Y; Xu H; Yang X; Sheng J; Tao Y; Li X; Zhu Y; Zhang X; Shen H; Ma Y; Wang F; Wu L; Wang X; Li Z; Bai Y
Am J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 118(5):802-811. PubMed ID: 36219172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhao S; Wang S; Pan P; Xia T; Chang X; Yang X; Guo L; Meng Q; Yang F; Qian W; Xu Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Gu L; Wang R; Jia F; Yao J; Li Z; Bai Y
Gastroenterology; 2019 May; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. PubMed ID: 30738046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial.
Kumar S; Thosani N; Ladabaum U; Friedland S; Chen AM; Kochar R; Banerjee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 27931951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of 9-Minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Zhao S; Yang X; Wang S; Meng Q; Wang R; Bo L; Chang X; Pan P; Xia T; Yang F; Yao J; Zheng J; Sheng J; Zhao X; Tang S; Wang Y; Wang Y; Gong A; Chen W; Shen J; Zhu X; Wang S; Yan C; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Ma RJ; Wang R; Ma Y; Li Z; Bai Y
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e168-e181. PubMed ID: 33220526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep Learning Computer-aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi-center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT-CS Trial).
Glissen Brown JR; Mansour NM; Wang P; Chuchuca MA; Minchenberg SB; Chandnani M; Liu L; Gross SA; Sengupta N; Berzin TM
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jul; 20(7):1499-1507.e4. PubMed ID: 34530161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.
Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS
Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).
Rameshshanker R; Tsiamoulos Z; Wilson A; Rajendran A; Bassett P; Tekkis P; Saunders BP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Apr; 91(4):894-904.e1. PubMed ID: 31836474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of adenoma miss rate and adenoma detection rate between conventional colonoscopy and colonoscopy with second-generation distal attachment cuff: a multicenter, randomized, back-to-back trial.
van Keulen KE; Papanikolaou IS; Mak TWC; Apostolopoulos P; Neumann H; Delconte G; Furnari M; Peters Y; Lau JYW; Polymeros D; Schrauwen RWN; Cavalcoli F; Koukoulioti E; Triantafyllou K; Anderson JC; Pohl H; Rex DK; Siersema PD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 May; 99(5):798-808.e3. PubMed ID: 37993062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup.
Siersema PD; Rastogi A; Leufkens AM; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; DeMarco DC
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(26):3400-8. PubMed ID: 22807609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of computer-aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah S; Park N; Chehade NEH; Chahine A; Monachese M; Tiritilli A; Moosvi Z; Ortizo R; Samarasena J
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 38(2):162-176. PubMed ID: 36350048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Colorectal Neoplasms Using Linked Color Imaging: A Prospective, Randomized, Tandem Colonoscopy Trial.
Hasegawa I; Yamamura T; Suzuki H; Maeda K; Sawada T; Mizutani Y; Ishikawa E; Ishikawa T; Kakushima N; Furukawa K; Ohno E; Kawashima H; Nakamura M; Fujishiro M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Aug; 19(8):1708-1716.e4. PubMed ID: 33839277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors associated with missed colorectal flat adenoma: a multicenter retrospective tandem colonoscopy study.
Xiang L; Zhan Q; Zhao XH; Wang YD; An SL; Xu YZ; Li AM; Gong W; Bai Y; Zhi FC; Liu SD
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 20(31):10927-37. PubMed ID: 25152596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing adenoma detection rates in the right side of the colon comparing retroflexion with a second forward view: a systematic review.
Desai M; Bilal M; Hamade N; Gorrepati VS; Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Jegadeesan R; Gupta N; Bhandari P; Repici A; Hassan C; Sharma P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):453-459.e3. PubMed ID: 30222971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 9-Minute Withdrawal Time Improves Adenoma Detection Rate Compared With 6-Minute Withdrawal Time During Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Aziz M; Haghbin H; Gangwani MK; Nawras M; Nawras Y; Dahiya DS; Sohail AH; Lee-Smith W; Kamal F; Shaukat A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 57(9):863-870. PubMed ID: 37389958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde inspection
Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO
Anderson JC; Kahi CJ; Sullivan A; MacPhail M; Garcia J; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):591-598. PubMed ID: 30367879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Kamba S; Tamai N; Saitoh I; Matsui H; Horiuchi H; Kobayashi M; Sakamoto T; Ego M; Fukuda A; Tonouchi A; Shimahara Y; Nishikawa M; Nishino H; Saito Y; Sumiyama K
J Gastroenterol; 2021 Aug; 56(8):746-757. PubMed ID: 34218329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory.
Munroe CA; Lee P; Copland A; Wu KK; Kaltenbach T; Soetikno RM; Friedland S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 22341103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted detection versus conventional colonoscopy for proximal colonic lesions: a multicenter, randomized, tandem-colonoscopy study.
Lui TKL; Hang DV; Tsao SKK; Hui CKY; Mak LLY; Ko MKL; Cheung KS; Thian MY; Liang R; Tsui VWM; Yeung CK; Dao LV; Leung WK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Feb; 97(2):325-334.e1. PubMed ID: 36208795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
