These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36222069)

  • 21. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
    Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. There is no correlation between a delayed gastric conduit emptying and the occurrence of an anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
    Babic B; Schiffmann LM; Fuchs HF; Mueller DT; Schmidt T; Mallmann C; Mielke L; Frebel A; Schiller P; Bludau M; Chon SH; Schroeder W; Bruns CJ
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6777-6783. PubMed ID: 34981236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of the transoral circular stapler for oesophagogastrectomy after induction therapy.
    Wang L; Milman S; Ng T
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Dec; 29(6):890-896. PubMed ID: 31436809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
    Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
    Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does circular stapled esophagogastric anastomotic size affect the incidence of postoperative strictures?
    Yendamuri S; Gutierrez L; Oni A; Mashtare T; Khushalani N; Yang G; Nava H; Demmy T; Nwogu C
    J Surg Res; 2011 Jan; 165(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21067773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Utility of the powered stapler for radical pulmonary resection: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Shigeeda W; Deguchi H; Tomoyasu M; Kudo S; Kaneko Y; Kanno H; Saito H
    Surg Today; 2021 Apr; 51(4):582-588. PubMed ID: 33037476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Omental Flap Wrapping Around the Esophagogastric Anastomosis and Association with Anastomotic Leak in Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.
    Yoshida N; Eto K; Matsumoto T; Kosumi K; Imamura Y; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Watanabe M; Baba H
    J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Jan; 236(1):189-197. PubMed ID: 36205406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study.
    Lee KY; Lee J; Park YY; Kim HJ; Oh ST
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287595. PubMed ID: 37903104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fallback technique with circular stapler prevents anastomotic obstruction after esophagectomy: A case report of surgical approach.
    Zhou P; Wang YL; Liu Q; Li JS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(8):e13571. PubMed ID: 30813121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and manual cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Cayi R; Li M; Xiong G; Cai K; Wang W
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):908-9. PubMed ID: 22699083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.
    Gooszen JAH; Goense L; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI
    Br J Surg; 2018 Apr; 105(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 29412450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A New Esophagogastric Anastomosis for McKeown Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer.
    Yang G; Chen JK; Wang XB; Zhao JB; Jiang T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Apr; 113(4):e307-e310. PubMed ID: 34270974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Embedded cervical esophagogastrostomy: a simple and convenient method using a circular stapler after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinomas.
    Wu S; Chen M; Wei L; Chen Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):2984-90. PubMed ID: 23645482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.