These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3622277)

  • 1. [The granting of interviews by physicians. The 20 November 1986 verdict of the Federal Supreme Court].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1987 Aug; 112(35):1352-3. PubMed ID: 3622277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Verdict of the Supreme Court of the Federal Republic of Germany on advertising by non-medical practitioners].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1982 Jun; 107(23):913-5. PubMed ID: 6282558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Settlements of claims for eye injuries in private accident insurance companies].
    Burggraf H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1983 Dec; 183(6):518-20. PubMed ID: 6668885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Legal obligations concerning medical records (author's transl)].
    Gramberg-Danielsen B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1980 Mar; 176(3):477-8. PubMed ID: 7421018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [No compensatory settlement in addition to cost reimbursement. The Federal Administrative Court upholds the verdict on compensation of the official].
    Jansen C
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1987 Dec; 112(51-52):2004-5. PubMed ID: 3691331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The insurance physician may discuss fee reductions with his patients. A verdict by the Federal Constitutional Court].
    Artzt G
    Fortschr Med; 1982 Feb; 100(5):151-2. PubMed ID: 7076084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Assessment of eye lesions in private accident insurance. IV. (Supplement). Decision of the German Federal Supreme Court dated Apr 24, 1974 (IVVZR 54/73, celle)].
    Burggraf H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1977 May; 170(5):786-7. PubMed ID: 894981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Supreme Court overturned the verdict against physicians in a case on a patient's informed consent].
    Löwdahl KK
    Lakartidningen; 1991 Sep; 88(39):3154-9. PubMed ID: 1921604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Professional discretion in cases of unfitness to drive due to impaired vision (author's transl)].
    Mewe L
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1979 Oct; 175(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 548626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The significance of the verdict of the Civil Court of Appeals of the Supreme Court of the DDR on 10/31/88 for medical disclosure and material liability of the health establishment].
    Gürtler R; Schmauss AK
    Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 2346067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The decision of the Federal Court of Justice and the Federal Social Court on neurosis].
    Grömig RH
    Med Monatsschr; 1967 Dec; 21(12):574-7. PubMed ID: 5609202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Verdict of the Federal Constitutional Court on term regulation].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Mar; 100(12):637-9. PubMed ID: 1122805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Displaying the term "traumatologist" on the practice sign. The 24 February 1987 verdict of the Münster Superior Administrative Court].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1987 Aug; 112(35):1353-4. PubMed ID: 3622278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The law and sterilization or permanent contraception (author's transl)].
    Brenner G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Mar; 42(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 6918350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supreme Court protects physicians performing mid-trimester abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Feb; 8(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11663972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying.
    Robichaud TD
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinton and appeals court signal death knell for Title X gag rule.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12344619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.