These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36222961)

  • 1. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-year evaluation of a nano-hybrid and a bulk-fill resin composite: a randomized, double-blind split-mouth clinical study.
    Çağırır Dindaroğlu F; Yılmaz E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(4):208. PubMed ID: 38467942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Durão MA; de Andrade AKM; do Prado AM; Veloso SRM; Maciel LMT; Montes MAJR; Monteiro GQM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6219-6237. PubMed ID: 33821322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of Bis-GMA free and Bis-GMA containing resin composite as posterior restoration on marginal integrity: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Reda SA; Hussein YF; Riad M
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):1022. PubMed ID: 38114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Correia AMO; Jurema ALB; Bresciani E; Caneppele TMF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):3083-3093. PubMed ID: 36763143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance of two ion-releasing bulk-fill composites in class I and class II restorations: A two-year evaluation.
    Albelasy EH; Hamama HH; Chew HP; Montasser M; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):723-736. PubMed ID: 38174898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Loguercio AD; Calazans FS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2023; 31():e20220323. PubMed ID: 36790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite for restoration of class II cavities - results after three years.
    Cieplik F; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M; Scholz KJ
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104275. PubMed ID: 36044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of two composite placement techniques on fracture resistance of MOD restorations with various resin composites.
    Bonilla ED; Hayashi M; Pameijer CH; Le NV; Morrow BR; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103348. PubMed ID: 32417397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-year Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial of Class II Restorations Using Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
    Moda MD; Briso AF; Hoshino I; Frascino S; Santos PH; Gonçalves DM; Fagundes TC
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):516-528. PubMed ID: 34520538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical comparison of different glass ionomer-based restoratives and a bulk-fill resin composite in Class I cavities: A 48-month randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
    Bayazıt EÖ; Başeren M; Meral E
    J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104473. PubMed ID: 36863696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
    Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations.
    Atabek D; Aktaş N; Sakaryali D; Bani M
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 28849804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.