199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36223865)
1. Impact of Health, Environmental, and Animal Welfare Messages Discouraging Red Meat Consumption: An Online Randomized Experiment.
Grummon AH; Musicus AA; Salvia MG; Thorndike AN; Rimm EB
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2023 Mar; 123(3):466-476.e26. PubMed ID: 36223865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing health and environmental warning messages about red meat: An online experiment.
Taillie LS; Prestemon CE; Hall MG; Grummon AH; Vesely A; Jaacks LM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0268121. PubMed ID: 35749387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Designing Environmental Messages to Discourage Red Meat Consumption: An Online Experiment.
Wistar A; Hall MG; Bercholz M; Taillie LS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing front-of-package warnings to discourage red meat consumption: a randomized experiment with US meat consumers.
Taillie LS; Chauvenet C; Grummon AH; Hall MG; Waterlander W; Prestemon CE; Jaacks LM
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Sep; 18(1):114. PubMed ID: 34493289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Awareness of and reactions to health and environmental harms of red meat among parents in the United States.
Grummon AH; Goodman D; Jaacks LM; Taillie LS; Chauvenet CA; Salvia MG; Rimm EB
Public Health Nutr; 2022 Apr; 25(4):893-903. PubMed ID: 34321133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should messages discourage sugary drinks, encourage water, or both? A randomized experiment with U.S. parents.
Grummon AH; Lazard AJ; Taillie LS; Hall MG
Prev Med; 2023 Feb; 167():107417. PubMed ID: 36592673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health or environment? Understanding which informative message is more effective in replacing red meat with mushroom-based alternatives.
De Cianni R; Mancuso T; Rizzo G; Migliore G
Appetite; 2024 Aug; 199():107405. PubMed ID: 38723668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How effective are messages and their characteristics in changing behavioural intentions to substitute plant-based foods for red meat? The mediating role of prior beliefs.
Vainio A; Irz X; Hartikainen H
Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():217-224. PubMed ID: 29447995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Climate Change Impact Menu Labels on Fast Food Ordering Choices Among US Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Wolfson JA; Musicus AA; Leung CW; Gearhardt AN; Falbe J
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Dec; 5(12):e2248320. PubMed ID: 36574248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Online Randomized Controlled Trials of Restaurant Sodium Warning Labels.
Musicus AA; Moran AJ; Lawman HG; Roberto CA
Am J Prev Med; 2019 Dec; 57(6):e181-e193. PubMed ID: 31753271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informational and emotional daily messages to reduce red and processed meat consumption.
Carfora V; Bertolotti M; Catellani P
Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104331. PubMed ID: 31276710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different Frames to Reduce Red Meat Intake: The Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy.
Bertolotti M; Carfora V; Catellani P
Health Commun; 2020 Apr; 35(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 30676108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reactions to messages about smoking, vaping and COVID-19: two national experiments.
Grummon AH; Hall MG; Mitchell CG; Pulido M; Mendel Sheldon J; Noar SM; Ribisl KM; Brewer NT
Tob Control; 2022 May; 31(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 33188150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Cognitive-Emotional Model to Explain Message Framing Effects: Reducing Meat Consumption.
Carfora V; Pastore M; Catellani P
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():583209. PubMed ID: 33854457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of red meat taxes and warning labels on food groups selected in a randomized controlled trial.
Willits-Smith A; Taillie LS; Jaacks LM; Frank SM; Grummon AH
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2024 Apr; 21(1):39. PubMed ID: 38622655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of animal welfare-, environmental-, and health-focused video appeals on implicit and explicit wanting of meat and intentions to reduce meat consumption.
Herchenroeder L; Forestell CA; Bravo AJ
J Soc Psychol; 2023 May; 163(3):394-407. PubMed ID: 35670371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability.
Clonan A; Wilson P; Swift JA; Leibovici DG; Holdsworth M
Public Health Nutr; 2015 Sep; 18(13):2446-56. PubMed ID: 25766000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlational study and randomised controlled trial for understanding and changing red meat consumption: The role of eating identities.
Carfora V; Caso D; Conner M
Soc Sci Med; 2017 Feb; 175():244-252. PubMed ID: 28129949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomised controlled trial of a text messaging intervention for reducing processed meat consumption: The mediating roles of anticipated regret and intention.
Carfora V; Caso D; Conner M
Appetite; 2017 Oct; 117():152-160. PubMed ID: 28651971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
