These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36224460)

  • 1. Our problems and observations in 3D facial implant planning.
    Saponaro G; Paolantonio C; Barbera G; Foresta E; Gasparini G; Moro A
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 44(1):32. PubMed ID: 36224460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Custom made onlay implants in peek in maxillofacial surgery: a volumetric study.
    Saponaro G; Doneddu P; Gasparini G; Staderini E; Boniello R; Todaro M; D'Amato G; Pelo S; Moro A
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2020 Feb; 36(2):385-391. PubMed ID: 31367783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants Through Virtual Surgical Planning and Three Different Techniques: Double-Barrel Flap, Implant Dynamic Navigation and CAD/CAM Mesh With Iliac Crest Graft.
    Antúnez-Conde R; Salmerón JI; Díez-Montiel A; Agea M; Gascón D; Sada Á; Navarro Cuéllar I; Tousidonis M; Ochandiano S; Arenas G; Navarro Cuéllar C
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():719712. PubMed ID: 34676161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone facial implants in a computer-aided planning workflow.
    Guevara-Rojas G; Figl M; Schicho K; Seemann R; Traxler H; Vacariu A; Carbon CC; Ewers R; Watzinger F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1801-12. PubMed ID: 24679957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three dimensional reconstruction of late post traumatic orbital wall defects by customized implants using CAD-CAM, 3D stereolithographic models: A case report.
    U V; Mehrotra D; Dichen ; Anand V; Howlader D
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2017; 7(3):212-218. PubMed ID: 29124002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rehabilitation of a dentate mandible requiring a full arch rehabilitation. Immediate loading of a fixed complete denture on 8 implants placed with a bone-supported surgical computer-planned guide: a case report.
    Amorfini L; Storelli S; Romeo E
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():106-13. PubMed ID: 21495798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient Specific Three-Dimensional Implant for Reconstruction of Complex Mandibular Defect.
    U V; Mehrotra D; Howlader D; Singh PK; Gupta S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 30(4):e308-e311. PubMed ID: 31166275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report.
    Huang YH; Seelaus R; Zhao L; Patel PK; Cohen M
    Int Med Case Rep J; 2016; 9():341-345. PubMed ID: 27843356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-assisted, template-guided immediate implant placement and loading in the mandible: a case report.
    Spielau T; Hauschild U; Katsoulis J
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):55. PubMed ID: 30975113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-Specific Implant in Prosthetic Craniofacial Reconstruction: First Report of a Novel Technique With Far-Reaching Perspective.
    Toso SM; Menzel K; Motzkus Y; Adolphs N; Hoffmeister B; Raguse JD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2133-5. PubMed ID: 26468797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Technique for Restoring Severely Resorbed Edentulous Mandible with a Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Surgical Guide and an Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis in Two Days.
    Turkyilmaz I; Isler SC; Uraz A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Apr; 20(4):524-528. PubMed ID: 31308287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyetheretherketone computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing framework for All-on-Four mandibular full-arch prosthesis: 3 Years' retrospective study of peri-implant soft tissue changes and ridge base relationship.
    Mourad KE; Altonbary GY; Emera RMK; Hegazy SAF
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):579-587. PubMed ID: 36069047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent advances in the reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing.
    Oh JH
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 40(1):2. PubMed ID: 29430438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegrated implants for orbito-facial prostheses: Preoperative planning tips and intraoperative pearls.
    Wei LA; Brown JJ; Hosek DK; Burkat CN
    Orbit; 2016; 35(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 26817410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses.
    Tanveer W; Ridwan-Pramana A; Molinero-Mourelle P; Forouzanfar T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilizing DICOM data to generate custom computer-aided designing and computer-aided machining polyetheretherketone healing abutments for an ear prosthesis.
    Dhiman M; Bhandari S; Gaba S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2020; 20(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 33487972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Multi-Criteria Assessment Strategy for 3D Printed Porous Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Patient-Specific Implants for Orbital Wall Reconstruction.
    Sharma N; Welker D; Aghlmandi S; Maintz M; Zeilhofer HF; Honigmann P; Seifert T; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2021 Aug; 10(16):. PubMed ID: 34441859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of bilateral ramus-condyle unit defect using custom titanium prosthesis with preservation of both condyles.
    Farajpour H; Bastami F; Bohlouli M; Khojasteh A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104765. PubMed ID: 34509905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining Intraoral and Face Scans for the Design and Fabrication of Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Implant-Supported Bars for Maxillary Overdentures.
    Mangano F; Mangano C; Margiani B; Admakin O
    Scanning; 2019; 2019():4274715. PubMed ID: 31531155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.