These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36225716)

  • 1. Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program.
    Fitzgerald BP; Hawley CE; Harrold CQ; Garrett JS; Polson AM; Rams TE
    J Oral Biol (Northborough); 2022 Jun; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36225716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
    Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study design for calibration of clinical examiners measuring periodontal parameters.
    Hill EG; Slate EH; Wiegand RE; Grossi SG; Salinas CF
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1129-41. PubMed ID: 16805674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
    Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
    Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of periodontal probing depth and attachment levels using a Florida probe versus traditional probes.
    Gupta N; Rath SK; Lohra P
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2015 Oct; 71(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 26663963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of probing depth and clinical attachment level using a manual probe and Florida probe.
    Kour A; Kumar A; Puri K; Khatri M; Bansal M; Gupta G
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2016; 20(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 27563204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a new computerized cemento-enamel junction probe.
    Deepa R; Prakash S
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 16(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 22654322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Intra- and Inter-examiner Reproducibility of Probing Depth Measurements with a Manual Periodontal Probe.
    Lafzi A; Mohammadi AS; Eskandari A; Pourkhamneh S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2007; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 23277829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assessment of conventional periodontal probes and CEJ handpiece of electronic probes in the diagnosis and primary care of periodontal disease.
    Bareja H; Bansal M; Naveen Kumar PG
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2021 Feb; 10(2):692-698. PubMed ID: 34041063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
    Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
    Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of smoking on bleeding on probing after nonsurgical periodontal therapy: a quasi-experimental study.
    Ardais R; Mário Tde G; Boligon J; Kantorski KZ; Moreira CH
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():1-7. PubMed ID: 25337935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treating periodontitis-a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ultrasonic and manual subgingival scaling at different probing pocket depths.
    Zhang X; Hu Z; Zhu X; Li W; Chen J
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):176. PubMed ID: 32586315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full-mouth treatment modalities (within 24 hours) for chronic periodontitis in adults.
    Eberhard J; Jepsen S; Jervøe-Storm PM; Needleman I; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 2015(4):CD004622. PubMed ID: 25884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-masked randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice on periodontal healing after one-stage full-mouth debridement.
    Pera C; Ueda P; Casarin RC; Ribeiro FV; Pimentel SP; Casati MZ; Cirano FR
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):909-16. PubMed ID: 22087803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examiner alignment and assessment in clinical periodontal research.
    Hefti AF; Preshaw PM
    Periodontol 2000; 2012 Jun; 59(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 22507059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.