132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36226574)
1. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mock jurors' perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type.
Mindthoff A; Malloy LC; Höhs JM
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 32496092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of confession evidence on jurors' verdict decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mindthoff A; Ferreira PA; Meissner CA
Law Hum Behav; 2024 Jun; 48(3):163-181. PubMed ID: 38949764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
Henderson KS; Levett LM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.
Semple JK; Woody WD
Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 22049670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
Maeder EM; McManus LA
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
Ewanation L; Maeder EM
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciding the fate of others: the cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making.
Kleider HM; Knuycky LR; Cavrak SE
J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(3):175-93. PubMed ID: 24837019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
