These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36226574)

  • 1. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
    Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
    Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mock jurors' perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type.
    Mindthoff A; Malloy LC; Höhs JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 32496092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
    Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
    Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of confession evidence on jurors' verdict decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mindthoff A; Ferreira PA; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Jun; 48(3):163-181. PubMed ID: 38949764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
    Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
    Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.
    Semple JK; Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 22049670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
    Maeder EM; McManus LA
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
    Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deciding the fate of others: the cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making.
    Kleider HM; Knuycky LR; Cavrak SE
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(3):175-93. PubMed ID: 24837019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.