132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36226574)
21. The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors' Perceptions of Recanted Confessions.
Ewanation L; Maeder EM
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():699077. PubMed ID: 34539496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.
Woestehoff SA; Meissner CA
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):564-79. PubMed ID: 27227274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
Brewer TW
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The bastard verdict and its influence on jurors.
Curley LJ; MacLean R; Murray J; Laybourn P; Brown D
Med Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 59(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30501474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status.
Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
Peter-Hagene L
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.
Shifton JJ
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):90-108. PubMed ID: 30706960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of individual differences on jurors' note taking during trials and recall of trial evidence, and the association between the type of evidence recalled and verdicts.
Lorek J; Centifanti LCM; Lyons M; Thorley C
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212491. PubMed ID: 30779768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
Maeder EM; Hunt JS
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.
Reichert J; Miller MK; Bornstein BH; Shelton HD
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):395-418. PubMed ID: 21308752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Racial bias in jury selection hurts mock jurors, not just defendants: Testing one potential intervention.
Abramowitz K; Douglass AB
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):153-168. PubMed ID: 36931855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.
Allely CS; Cooper P
J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
Devine K; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
Mossière A; Maeder EM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
