147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36226953)
21. Accuracy of triple test score in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump.
Ghimire B; Khan MI; Bibhusal T; Singh Y; Sayami P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(172):189-92. PubMed ID: 19079392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnosis by team work: an approach to conservatism.
Galea M; Blamey RW
Br Med Bull; 1991 Apr; 47(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 1933214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mammary hamartoma.
Ruiz Tovar J; Reguero Callejas ME; Aláez Chillarón AB; Ramiro Pérez C; Collado Guirao MV; Rojo Blanco R; Muñoz Martín-Cámara J; González-Palacios F; García Villanueva A
Clin Transl Oncol; 2006 Apr; 8(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16648106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Imaging of breast masses.
Bassett LW
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):669-91, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 10943270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump.
Leddy R; Irshad A; Zerwas E; Mayes N; Armeson K; Abid M; Cluver A; Campbell A; Ackerman S; Lewis M
Breast J; 2013; 19(6):582-9. PubMed ID: 24011215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Ultrasound detection of breast cancer with normal mammogram].
Schlecht I; Hadijuana J; Hosten N; Oellinger H; Minguillon C; Bomhard T; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Sep; 5(5):297-300. PubMed ID: 7495891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Core needle biopsy of palpable breast lump: the influence of needle size.
Wong TE; Hisham AN
Med J Malaysia; 2003 Aug; 58(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 14750380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnosis of palpable breast lesions in younger women by the modified triple test is accurate and cost-effective.
Vetto JT; Pommier RF; Schmidt WA; Eppich H; Alexander PW
Arch Surg; 1996 Sep; 131(9):967-72; discussion 972-4. PubMed ID: 8790167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with palpable breast abnormalities and negative mammographic and sonographic findings.
Yalniz C; Campbell D; Le-Petross C; Shin K; Bevers TB; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1289-1295. PubMed ID: 32108973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Palpable Lumps after Mastectomy: Radiologic-Pathologic Review of Benign and Malignant Masses.
Al-Khalili R; Alzeer A; Nguyen GK; Crane EP; Song JH; Jeon JL; Nellamattathil M; Makariou EV; Mango VL
Radiographics; 2021; 41(4):967-989. PubMed ID: 33989071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of ultrasound guided versus conventional fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing breast malignancies among patients with palpable breast lumps at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza Tanzania.
Kamushaga TB; Giiti GC; Kidenya BR; Ngoya PS; Rambau PF
Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 39():133. PubMed ID: 34527149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions.
Takhellambam YS; Lourembam SS; Sapam OS; Kshetrimayum RS; Ningthoujam BS; Khan T
J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Dec; 7(12):2847-50. PubMed ID: 24551655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast Ultrasound Volume Sweep Imaging: A New Horizon in Expanding Imaging Access for Breast Cancer Detection.
Marini TJ; Castaneda B; Iyer R; Baran TM; Nemer O; Dozier AM; Parker KJ; Zhao Y; Serratelli W; Matos G; Ali S; Ghobryal B; Visca A; O'Connell A
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Apr; 42(4):817-832. PubMed ID: 35802491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection and evaluation of a palpable breast mass.
Pruthi S
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):641-7; quiz 647-8. PubMed ID: 11393504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How many tests are required in the diagnosis of palpable breast abnormalities?
Hardy JR; Powles TJ; Judson I; Heron C; Williams M; Cherryman G; Husband J; Cosgrove D; Blaszcyzyk M; Sinnett HD
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1990 May; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 2261402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age.
Chung M; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Knobel A; Greenwood HI; Ray KM; Joe BN; Lee AY
Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):316-324. PubMed ID: 32870133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benign breast disorders.
Onstad M; Stuckey A
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep; 40(3):459-73. PubMed ID: 24021252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Benign breast disease: when to treat, when to reassure, when to refer.
Vaidyanathan L; Barnard K; Elnicki DM
Cleve Clin J Med; 2002 May; 69(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 12022387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Managing the breast lump. Solving the dilemma--reassurance versus investigation.
Hirst C
Aust Fam Physician; 1989 Feb; 18(2):121-123, 126. PubMed ID: 2705944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
