These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36227302)

  • 1. The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF): A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity.
    Burghart M; de Ruiter C; Hynes SE; Krishnan N; Levtova Y; Uyar A
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jan; 35(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 36227302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.
    Kleeven ATH; de Vries Robbé M; Mulder EA; Popma A
    Assessment; 2022 Mar; 29(2):181-197. PubMed ID: 32964720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic violence risk, protective factors, and therapeutic change in a gender and ethnoculturally diverse sample of court-adjudicated youth.
    Lovatt KM; Stockdale KC; Olver ME
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Feb; 34(2):105-124. PubMed ID: 34460284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders.
    Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version.
    Nolan T; Willis GM; Thornton D; Kelley SM; Christofferson SB
    Sex Abuse; 2023 Mar; 35(2):241-260. PubMed ID: 35507760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Predictive Validity of Three Youth Violence Assessment Instruments: The SAVRY, VRS-YV, and SAPROF-YV.
    Koh LL; Day A; Klettke B; Daffern M; Chu CM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Feb; 66(2-3):168-185. PubMed ID: 33167725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength-based assessment for future violence risk: a retrospective validation study of the Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) Japanese version in forensic psychiatric inpatients.
    Kashiwagi H; Kikuchi A; Koyama M; Saito D; Hirabayashi N
    Ann Gen Psychiatry; 2018; 17():5. PubMed ID: 29422940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing protective factors in treated violent offenders: Associations with recidivism reduction and positive community outcomes.
    Coupland RBA; Olver ME
    Psychol Assess; 2020 May; 32(5):493-508. PubMed ID: 32068419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.
    Zeng G; Chu CM; Lee Y
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 25527632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services.
    Abidin Z; Davoren M; Naughton L; Gibbons O; Nulty A; Kennedy HG
    BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Jul; 13():197. PubMed ID: 23890106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Köhler N; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing protective factors to prevent post-discharge violent behaviour: Towards an assets-based approach for clinical risk management.
    Doyle M; Coid J; Ullrich S; Shaw J
    J Psychiatr Res; 2021 Nov; 143():416-421. PubMed ID: 34655951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Promotive, Mixed, and Risk Effects of Individual Items Comprising the SAPROF Assessment Tool With Justice-Involved Youth.
    Langton CM; Betteridge M; Worling JR
    Assessment; 2024 Mar; 31(2):418-430. PubMed ID: 37038332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-psychopathy men with a history of sexual offending have protective factors too: But are these risk relevant and can they change in treatment?
    Olver ME; Riemer EK
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2021 May; 89(5):406-420. PubMed ID: 33829820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Protective Factors for Violence Risk in U.K. General Mental Health Services Using the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors.
    Haines A; Brown A; Javaid SF; Khan F; Noblett S; Omodunbi O; Sadiq K; Zaman W; Whittington R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Sep; 62(12):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 29284378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive validity of the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV is poor for intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescent offenders.
    Shaffer CS; Viljoen JL; Douglas KS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 35357879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protective factors in the prediction of criminal outcomes for youth with sexual offenses using tools developed for adults and adolescents: Tests of direct effects and moderation of risk.
    Langton CM; Awrey MJ; Worling JR
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jun; 35(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 36862457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample.
    Eisenbarth H; Osterheider M; Nedopil N; Stadtland C
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 22718134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism.
    De Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Douglas KS; Nijman HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 24933171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.