These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36227319)

  • 1. Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.
    Redlich AD; Domagalski K; Woestehoff SA; Dezember A; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):337-352. PubMed ID: 36227319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
    Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
    Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.
    Redlich AD; Bonventre CL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process.
    Fountain EN; Woolard J
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 34110873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining: The roles of prosecutors and defense attorneys.
    Monahan J; Metz A; Garrett BL; Jakubow A
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31797449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. COVID-19 exacerbates existing system factors that disadvantage defendants: Findings from a national survey of defense attorneys.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Henderson KS; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 34110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The trial tax and the intersection of race/ethnicity, gender, and age in criminal court sentencing.
    Lehmann PS
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):201-216. PubMed ID: 36931858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions.
    Redlich AD; Shteynberg RV
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):611-625. PubMed ID: 27348715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Homelessness and pretrial detention predict unfavorable outcomes in the plea bargaining process.
    Davis RW
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):201-213. PubMed ID: 35604706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):427-441. PubMed ID: 30047747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic.
    Wilford MM; Zimmerman DM; Yan S; Sutherland KT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):739-750. PubMed ID: 34138621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do moral intuitions influence judges' sentencing decisions? A multilevel study of criminal court sentencing in Pennsylvania.
    Silver E; Ulmer JT; Silver JR
    Soc Sci Res; 2023 Sep; 115():102927. PubMed ID: 37858364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attorneys' experiences, perceptions, and plea recommendations in child sexual abuse cases.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD; Aronson E; McWilliams K
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 38573702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Insanity defense pleas in Baltimore City: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS; Dunn MH; Roskes EJ; Briskin JK; Rudolph MS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1996 Nov; 153(11):1464-8. PubMed ID: 8890682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Juvenile crime and criminal justice: resolving border disputes.
    Fagan J
    Future Child; 2008; 18(2):81-118. PubMed ID: 21337999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A National Survey of Problem-Solving Court Staff Perceptions of In-Person versus Virtual Hearings.
    Andraka-Christou B; Atkins DD; Clark MH; Del Pozo B; Ray B
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2024 Mar; 52(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 38467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjudicative Competence in the Context of a Defendant's Absence from Trial after a Suicide Attempt.
    Williams JB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2023 Dec; 51(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 38065620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining changes in procedural justice and their influence on problem-solving court outcomes.
    Dollar CB; Ray B; Hudson MK; Hood BJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 29460437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.