181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36227588)
1. 10-year opportunistic mammographic screening scenario in Brazil and its impact on breast cancer early detection: a nationwide population-based study.
Cuoghi IC; da Silva Soares MF; Dos Santos GMC; Dos-Reis FJC; Poli-Neto OB; de Andrade JM; Bosquesi PL; Orlandini LF; Tiezzi DG
J Glob Health; 2022 Oct; 12():04061. PubMed ID: 36227588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Difficult Access and Poor Productivity: Mammography Screening in Brazil.
Rodrigues DCN; Freitas-Junior R; Rahal RMS; Correa RDS; Peixoto JE; Ribeiro NV; Ferreira NC; Soares LR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 31244310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system.
Teh YC; Tan GH; Taib NA; Rahmat K; Westerhout CJ; Fadzli F; See MH; Jamaris S; Yip CH
BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():405. PubMed ID: 25972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH
BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nutritional status coverage trend registered in the SISVAN web in seven municipalities of the Zona Da Mata Mineira, Brazil, from 2008 to 2017, and its association with socio-economic, demographic and organisation of health system variables.
Gonçalves IDSA; Pereira PF; Silva MBL; Ladeira FB; Moreira TR; Cotta RMM; da Costa GD
J Nutr Sci; 2020 Jan; 9():e4. PubMed ID: 32042412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on breast cancer screening and detection of high-risk mammographic findings.
Moterani Júnior NJW; Moterani VC; Moterani LBBG; Pimentel FF; Reis FJCD
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2022; 68(6):842-846. PubMed ID: 35584436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal changes in breast cancer screening coverage provided under the Brazilian National Health Service between 2008 and 2017.
Rodrigues DCN; Freitas-Junior R; Rahal RMS; da Silveira Corrêa R; Gouveia PA; Peixoto JE; Martins E; Soares LR
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):959. PubMed ID: 31319826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Factors associated with lack of mammograms and clinical breast examination by women: a population-based study in Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil].
Amorim VM; Barros MB; César CL; Carandina L; Goldbaum M
Cad Saude Publica; 2008 Nov; 24(11):2623-32. PubMed ID: 19009142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with the proportion of abnormal results in screening mammograms: ecological study.
Sverzut TDVL; Cunha IPD; Cortellazi KL; Ambrosano GMB; Pecorari VGA
Rev Gaucha Enferm; 2023; 44():e20220155. PubMed ID: 37377270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mammographic over-screening: evaluation based on probabilistic linkage of records databases from the Breast Cancer Information System (SISMAMA)].
Rodrigues TB; Stavola B; Bustamante-Teixeira MT; Guerra MR; Nogueira MC; Fayer VA; Corrêa CSL; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Cad Saude Publica; 2019; 35(1):e00049718. PubMed ID: 30652825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution of the Unified Health Care System to mammography screening in Brazil, 2013.
Freitas-Junior R; Rodrigues DC; Corrêa RD; Peixoto JE; de Oliveira HV; Rahal RM
Radiol Bras; 2016; 49(5):305-310. PubMed ID: 27818544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Associated With Mammographic Screening and Adjuvant Therapy From 1986 to 2013 in the State of Victoria, Australia.
Burton R; Stevenson C
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jun; 3(6):e208249. PubMed ID: 32573707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast imaging hindered during covid-19 pandemic, in Brazil.
Bessa JF
Rev Saude Publica; 2021; 55():8. PubMed ID: 33978114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mammogram screening for breast cancer and associated factors in the South of Brazil: a based-population survey].
Schneider IJ; Giehl MW; Boing AF; d'Orsi E
Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Sep; 30(9):1987-97. PubMed ID: 25317527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Sprague BL; Conant EF; Onega T; Garcia MP; Beaber EF; Herschorn SD; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN; Lacson R; Schnall MD; Kontos D; Haas JS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(7):457-464. PubMed ID: 27428568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inequities in access to mammographic screening in Brazil.
Nogueira MC; Fayer VA; Corrêa CSL; Guerra MR; Stavola B; Dos-Santos-Silva I; Bustamante-Teixeira MT; Silva GAE
Cad Saude Publica; 2019 Jul; 35(6):e00099817. PubMed ID: 31291424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
