184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36227588)
41. A simulation model investigating the impact of tumor volume doubling time and mammographic tumor detectability on screening outcomes in women aged 40-49 years.
Bailey SL; Sigal BM; Plevritis SK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1263-71. PubMed ID: 20664027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Estimated mammogram coverage in Goiás State, Brazil].
Corrêa Rda S; Freitas-Júnior R; Peixoto JE; Rodrigues DC; Lemos ME; Marins LA; Silveira EA
Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Sep; 27(9):1757-67. PubMed ID: 21986603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Annual mammography screening: is it necessary?
Hegar V; Oliveira K; Kakarala B; Mangram A; Dunn E
Am Surg; 2012 Jan; 78(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 22273325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Mammographic Screening of Women Attending a Reference Service Center in Southern Brazil.
Romeiro Lopes TC; Franca Gravena AA; Demitto Mde O; Brischiliari SC; Borghesan DH; Dell Agnolo CM; Carvalho MD; Pelloso SM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(3):1385-91. PubMed ID: 27039777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.
Elmore JG; Nakano CY; Koepsell TD; Desnick LM; D'Orsi CJ; Ransohoff DF
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Sep; 95(18):1384-93. PubMed ID: 13130114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.
Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Milanese T; Carston MJ; Sellers TA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 17507617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Survival of patients with operable breast cancer (Stages I-III) at a Brazilian public hospital--a closer look into cause-specific mortality.
Balabram D; Turra CM; Gobbi H
BMC Cancer; 2013 Sep; 13():434. PubMed ID: 24063763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Age-based versus Risk-based Mammography Screening in Women 40-49 Years Old: A Cross-sectional Study.
Burnside ES; Trentham-Dietz A; Shafer CM; Hampton JM; Alagoz O; Cox JR; Mischo E; Schrager SB; Wilke LG
Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):321-328. PubMed ID: 31184557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.
White A; Miller J; Royalty J; Ryerson AB; Benard V; Helsel W; Kammerer W
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 25809209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
Sterns EE
J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Access to early breast cancer diagnosis in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: an analysis of data from the Health Information System].
Azevedo E Silva G; Bustamante-Teixeira MT; Aquino EM; Tomazelli JG; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Jul; 30(7):1537-50. PubMed ID: 25166949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Costs of mammogram campaigns in the Regional Health Division of Marília, São Paulo State, Brazil, 2005-2006].
Marconato RR; Soárez PC; Ciconelli RM
Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1529-36. PubMed ID: 21877001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Nationwide cross-sectional adherence to mammography screening guidelines: national behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey results.
Narayan A; Fischer A; Zhang Z; Woods R; Morris E; Harvey S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):719-725. PubMed ID: 28508184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Training Community Health Workers to promote breast cancer screening in Brazil.
Bittencourt L; Scarinci IC
Health Promot Int; 2019 Feb; 34(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 29036489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Mammography Coverage and Tumor Stage in the Opportunistic Screening Context.
Magario MB; Poli-Neto OB; Tiezzi DG; Angotti Carrara HH; Moreira de Andrade J; Candido Dos Reis FJ
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(6):456-459. PubMed ID: 31133460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Downstaging in opportunistic breast cancer screening in Brazil: a temporal trend analysis.
Vale DB; Filho CC; Shinzato JY; Spreafico FS; Basu P; Zeferino LC
BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):432. PubMed ID: 31077162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Mammographic screening in women at increased risk of breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.
Kwong A; Hancock SL; Bloom JR; Pal S; Birdwell RL; Mariscal C; Ikeda DM
Breast J; 2008; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18186864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
