These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36227862)
1. Assessment of the hypervascularized fraction of glioblastomas using a volume analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI may help to identify pseudoprogression. Roques M; Catalaa I; Raveneau M; Attal J; Siegfried A; Darcourt J; Cognard C; de Champfleur NM; Bonneville F PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0270216. PubMed ID: 36227862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of volume analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging in untreated glioblastomas. Roques M; Raveneau M; Adam G; De Barros A; Catalaa I; Patsoura S; Cognard C; Darcourt J; Bonneville F Neuroradiology; 2022 Sep; 64(9):1763-1771. PubMed ID: 35364709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of pseudoprogression in post-treatment glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived oxygenation and microvascular transit time heterogeneity measures. Park JE; Kim HS; Kim N; Borra R; Mouridsen K; Hansen MB; Kim YH; Hong CK; Kim JH Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3061-3073. PubMed ID: 37848773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiating Tumor Progression from Pseudoprogression in Patients with Glioblastomas Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI. Wang S; Martinez-Lage M; Sakai Y; Chawla S; Kim SG; Alonso-Basanta M; Lustig RA; Brem S; Mohan S; Wolf RL; Desai A; Poptani H AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 26450533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Longitudinal, leakage corrected and uncorrected rCBV during the first-line treatment of glioblastoma: a prospective study. Steidl E; Müller M; Müller A; Herrlinger U; Hattingen E J Neurooncol; 2019 Sep; 144(2):409-417. PubMed ID: 31321614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential for differentiation of pseudoprogression from true tumor progression with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using ferumoxytol vs. gadoteridol: a pilot study. Gahramanov S; Raslan AM; Muldoon LL; Hamilton BE; Rooney WD; Varallyay CG; Njus JM; Haluska M; Neuwelt EA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Feb; 79(2):514-23. PubMed ID: 20395065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question. Nasseri M; Gahramanov S; Netto JP; Fu R; Muldoon LL; Varallyay C; Hamilton BE; Neuwelt EA Neuro Oncol; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1146-54. PubMed ID: 24523362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI into a radiomics model improves diagnostic performance for pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients. Kim JY; Park JE; Jo Y; Shim WH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim HS Neuro Oncol; 2019 Feb; 21(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 30107606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging. Choi YJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Kim SJ; Suh DC Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23592805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma. Thomas AA; Arevalo-Perez J; Kaley T; Lyo J; Peck KK; Shi W; Zhang Z; Young RJ J Neurooncol; 2015 Oct; 125(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26275367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. True progression versus pseudoprogression in the treatment of glioblastomas: a comparison study of normalized cerebral blood volume and apparent diffusion coefficient by histogram analysis. Song YS; Choi SH; Park CK; Yi KS; Lee WJ; Yun TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH; Jahng GH; Chang KH Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(4):662-72. PubMed ID: 23901325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy. Nam JG; Kang KM; Choi SH; Lim WH; Yoo RE; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Sohn CH AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Dec; 38(12):2243-2250. PubMed ID: 29074633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of brain infection from necrotic glioblastoma using combined analysis of diffusion and perfusion MRI. Chawla S; Wang S; Mohan S; Nasrallah M; Verma G; Brem S; O'Rourke DM; Wolf RL; Poptani H; Nabavizadeh SA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):184-194. PubMed ID: 29676844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual inspection of MR relative cerebral blood volume maps has limited value for distinguishing progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma multiforme patients. Kerkhof M; Tans PL; Hagenbeek RE; Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ; Holla FK; Postma TJ; Straathof CS; Dirven L; Taphoorn MJ; Vos MJ CNS Oncol; 2017 Oct; 6(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 28984142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using the initial and final area under the curves ratio derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MR imaging. Suh CH; Kim HS; Choi YJ; Kim N; Kim SJ AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Dec; 34(12):2278-86. PubMed ID: 23828115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interval Change in Diffusion and Perfusion MRI Parameters for the Assessment of Pseudoprogression in Cerebral Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiation. Knitter JR; Erly WK; Stea BD; Lemole GM; Germano IM; Doshi AH; Nael K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):168-175. PubMed ID: 29708785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial. Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis. Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastasis by Gradient of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in the Peritumoral Brain Zone Derived from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging. She D; Xing Z; Cao D J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 30015801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Refinement of response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) using non-enhancing lesion type and contrast enhancement evolution pattern in IDH wild-type glioblastomas. Moon HH; Kim HS; Park JE; Kim YH; Kim JH BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):654. PubMed ID: 34074252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]