318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36227872)
1. Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Blankenship CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Zhang F
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275772. PubMed ID: 36227872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peripheral neural synchrony in post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant users.
He S; Skidmore J; Bruce IC; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y
medRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 37461681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinically recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials from paediatric cochlear implant users fitted with electrically elicited stapedius reflex thresholds.
Kosaner J; Van Dun B; Yigit O; Gultekin M; Bayguzina S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():100-112. PubMed ID: 29605337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
Berger JI; Gander PE; Kim S; Schwalje AT; Woo J; Na YM; Holmes A; Hong JM; Dunn CC; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1107-1120. PubMed ID: 37144890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical reorganization after cochlear implantation for adults with single-sided deafness.
Legris E; Galvin J; Roux S; Gomot M; Aoustin JM; Marx M; He S; Bakhos D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204402. PubMed ID: 30248131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve's Ability to Recover From Neural Adaptation, Cortical Encoding of and Perceptual Sensitivity to Within-channel Temporal Gaps in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Yuan Y; Skidmore J
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1202-1211. PubMed ID: 37018083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral Neural Synchrony in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Skidmore J; Bruce IC; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y
Ear Hear; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38503720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation, Perceptual Amplitude Modulation Rate Discrimination Sensitivity, and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Skidmore J; Koch B; Chatterjee M; Carter BL; Yuan Y
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):371-384. PubMed ID: 36342278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes and Electrophysiological Measures of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Skidmore J; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y; He S
Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 37194125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamics of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) for tone and speech tokens.
Cone B; Whitaker R
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 23722003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustically evoked auditory change complex in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a potential objective tool for identifying cochlear implant candidates.
He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Woodard J; Park LR; Hatch DR; Roush P; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 25422994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Zhang F; Underwood G; McGuire K; Liang C; Moore DR; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():12-20. PubMed ID: 31035223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
