BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36228022)

  • 1. Conflict over fertilization underlies the transient evolution of reinforcement.
    Rushworth CA; Wardlaw AM; Ross-Ibarra J; Brandvain Y
    PLoS Biol; 2022 Oct; 20(10):e3001814. PubMed ID: 36228022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its effect on reinforcement.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    J Evol Biol; 2007 May; 20(3):937-49. PubMed ID: 17465905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Rate of Evolution of Postmating-Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Drosophila.
    Turissini DA; McGirr JA; Patel SS; David JR; Matute DR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Feb; 35(2):312-334. PubMed ID: 29048573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Persistent postmating, prezygotic reproductive isolation between populations.
    Garlovsky MD; Snook RR
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(17):9062-9073. PubMed ID: 30271566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.
    Matute DR
    PLoS Biol; 2010 Mar; 8(3):e1000341. PubMed ID: 20351771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Informative predation: Towards a new species concept].
    Lherminier P
    C R Biol; 2018 Apr; 341(4):209-218. PubMed ID: 29606595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Males and females contribute differently to the evolution of habitat segregation driven by hybridization.
    Kyogoku D; Yamaguchi R
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):515-528. PubMed ID: 36721300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Divergent evolutionary trajectories shape the postmating transcriptional profiles of conspecifically and heterospecifically mated cactophilic Drosophila females.
    Diaz F; Allan CW; Chen X; Coleman JM; Bono JM; Matzkin LM
    Commun Biol; 2022 Aug; 5(1):842. PubMed ID: 35986208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila.
    Matute DR
    Curr Biol; 2010 Dec; 20(24):2229-33. PubMed ID: 21129972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple Genes Cause Postmating Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in the Drosophila virilis Group.
    Ahmed-Braimah YH
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Dec; 6(12):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 27729433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2001 Oct; 55(10):1909-20. PubMed ID: 11761053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in
    Davis JS; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 28116047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular evolution of candidate genes involved in post-mating-prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Bono JM; Matzkin LM; Hoang K; Brandsmeier L
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 25522894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speciation and the evolution of gamete recognition genes: pattern and process.
    Palumbi SR
    Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Jan; 102(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 19018273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of heterospecific mating frequency on the strength of cryptic reproductive barriers.
    Larson EL; Brassil MM; Maslan J; Juárez D; Lilagan F; Tipton H; Schweitzer A; Skillman J; Monsen-Collar KJ; Peterson MA
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Sep; 32(9):900-912. PubMed ID: 31162735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maternal control of gamete choice during fertilization.
    Nair S
    Int J Dev Biol; 2020; 64(1-2-3):175-180. PubMed ID: 32659006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis.
    Pfennig KS
    Evolution; 2003 Dec; 57(12):2842-51. PubMed ID: 14761062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.