141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36228867)
1. Pain and satisfaction in women induced by vaginal dinoprostone, double balloon catheter and oral misoprostol.
Druenne J; Semay T; Giraud A; Chauleur C; Raia-Barjat T
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Dec; 51(10):102484. PubMed ID: 36228867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone.
Perry KG; Larmon JE; May WL; Robinette LG; Martin RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1333-40. PubMed ID: 9662319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS).
Place K; Kruit H; Rahkonen L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Oct; 101(10):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 35933726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
Girault A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of vaginal prostaglandins with oral misoprostol as a second line of cervical ripening after using a cervical balloon catheter].
Hadhoum S; Ghesquière L; Drumez E; Subtil D; Garabedian C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2024 Feb; 52(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 37995911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.
Duro-Gómez J; Garrido-Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez-Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona-Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 296(4):777-781. PubMed ID: 28831553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques.
Barrilleaux PS; Bofill JA; Terrone DA; Magann EF; May WL; Morrison JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 12066084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Agarwal N; Gupta A; Kriplani A; Bhatla N; Parul
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
