170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36229632)
1. Distractor ignoring is as effective as target enhancement when incidentally learned but not when explicitly cued.
Addleman DA; Störmer VS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):834-844. PubMed ID: 36229632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):785-795. PubMed ID: 36045310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learned low priority of attention after training to suppress color singleton distractor.
Huang Z; Li S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):814-824. PubMed ID: 36175765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features.
Addleman DA; Störmer VS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1338-1346. PubMed ID: 35318583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distinct mechanisms of attentional suppression: exploration of trait factors underlying cued- and learned-suppression.
Chidharom M; Carlisle NB
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):26. PubMed ID: 38691325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learned feature regularities enable suppression of spatially overlapping stimuli.
Thayer DD; Miller M; Giesbrecht B; Sprague TC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):769-784. PubMed ID: 36417129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency.
Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are self-caused distractors easier to ignore? Experiments with the flanker task.
Gao C; Gozli DG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):853-865. PubMed ID: 33155125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?
Burgess E; Hauck C; De Pooter E; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):634-648. PubMed ID: 36207664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can enhancement and suppression concurrently guide attention? An assessment at the individual level.
Kawashima T; Amano K
F1000Res; 2022; 11():232. PubMed ID: 35811789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
