294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36229871)
1. Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology.
Mazurek-Popczyk J; Nowicki A; Arkusz K; Pałka Ł; Zimoch-Korzycka A; Baldy-Chudzik K
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):442. PubMed ID: 36229871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of surface roughness, wettability and adhesion of multispecies biofilm on 3D-printed resins for the base and teeth of complete dentures.
Poker BC; Oliveira VC; Macedo AP; Gonçalves M; Ramos AP; Silva-Lovato CH
J Appl Oral Sci; 2024; 32():e20230326. PubMed ID: 38656049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.
Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Printing Layer Thickness on Optical Properties and Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed Resins: An In Vitro Study.
Sasany R; Jamjoon FZ; Kendirci MY; Yilmaz B
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):165-173. PubMed ID: 38787581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acrylic resins for interim restorations before and after polishing.
Gantz L; Fauxpoint G; Arntz Y; Pelletier H; Etienne O
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):833.e1-833.e10. PubMed ID: 33685655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The flexural strength of 3D-printed provisional restorations fabricated with different resins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Saini RS; Gurumurthy V; Quadri SA; Bavabeedu SS; Abdelaziz KM; Okshah A; Alshadidi AAF; Yessayan L; Mosaddad SA; Heboyan A
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):66. PubMed ID: 38200473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods.
Simoneti DM; Pereira-Cenci T; Dos Santos MBF
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):168-172. PubMed ID: 33168174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of denture-coating composite on Candida albicans biofilm and surface degradation after disinfection protocol.
Silva MJ; de Oliveira DG; Marcillo OO; Neppelenbroek KH; Lara VS; Porto VC
Int Dent J; 2016 Apr; 66(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 26748533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of liquid-polish coating on in vivo biofilm accumulation on provisional restorations: part 1.
Perez Davidi M; Beyth N; Sterer N; Feuerstein O; Weiss EI
Quintessence Int; 2007; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 17694216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations: Comparison of mechanical and biological properties.
Atria PJ; Bordin D; Marti F; Nayak VV; Conejo J; Benalcázar Jalkh E; Witek L; Sampaio CS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):804-815. PubMed ID: 35187786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An organotypic model of oral mucosa cells for the biological assessment of 3D printed resins for interim restorations.
Alamo L; Cassiano FB; Bordini EAF; Stuani VT; Pacheco LE; Gallinari MO; Souza Costa CA; Mondelli RFL; Soares DG
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):251-259. PubMed ID: 35864023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytocompatibility of 3D printed dental materials for temporary restorations on fibroblasts.
Park JH; Lee H; Kim JW; Kim JH
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):157. PubMed ID: 32487153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of surface glazing on the mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed permanent dental resin materials.
Nam NE; Hwangbo NK; Kim JE
J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Apr; 68(2):273-282. PubMed ID: 37245959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytotoxicity of 3D printed resin materials for temporary restorations on human periodontal ligament (PDL-hTERT) cells.
Folwaczny M; Ahantab R; Kessler A; Ern C; Frasheri I
Dent Mater; 2023 May; 39(5):529-537. PubMed ID: 37055304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.
Buergers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of build orientation in gloss, roughness and color of 3D-printed resins for provisional indirect restorations.
de Castro EF; Nima G; Rueggeberg FA; Araújo-Neto VG; Faraoni JJ; Palma-Dibb RG; Giannini M
Dent Mater; 2023 Jul; 39(7):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 37248138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial adhesion to composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing.
Ozer NE; Sahin Z; Yikici C; Duyan S; Kilicarslan MA
Odontology; 2024 Apr; 112(2):460-471. PubMed ID: 37819468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Interdisciplinary Study Regarding the Characteristics of Dental Resins Used for Temporary Bridges.
Mârțu I; Murariu A; Baciu ER; Savin CN; Foia I; Tatarciuc M; Diaconu-Popa D
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jun; 58(6):. PubMed ID: 35744074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
