BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3623048)

  • 1. [Prognostic significance of flow cytophotometric studies in ovarian cancer].
    Volm M; Kleine W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 47(7):456-9. PubMed ID: 3623048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic relevance of ploidy, proliferation, and resistance-predictive tests in ovarian carcinoma.
    Volm M; Brüggemann A; Günther M; Kleine W; Pfleiderer A; Vogt-Schaden M
    Cancer Res; 1985 Oct; 45(10):5180-5. PubMed ID: 4027994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic significance of DNA content in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Gajewski WH; Fuller AF; Pastel-Ley C; Flotte TJ; Bell DA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8175021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction in ovarian cancer determined by flow cytometry following detection of cytokeratin-labeled tumor cells.
    Kimmig R; Wimberger P; Hillemanns P; Kapsner T; Caspari C; Hepp H
    Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Jan; 84(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 11748971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-year follow-up study of independent clinical and flow cytometric prognostic factors for the survival of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.
    Volm M; Hahn EW; Mattern J; Müller T; Vogt-Moykopf I; Weber E
    Cancer Res; 1988 May; 48(10):2923-8. PubMed ID: 2834052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of cellular DNA content on survival in ovarian carcinoma.
    Klemi PJ; Joensuu H; Mäenpää J; Kiilholma P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 2748056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flow cytometry as a tool for the prognostic assessment of patients with lung and ovarian carcinomas.
    Volm M; Drings P; Kleine W; Mattern J
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1987 Dec; 163(12):791-4. PubMed ID: 2827331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferative indices in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Ma J; Nicholas ; Terry HA; Lin SX; Patel N; Mai HG; Hong MH; Lu TX; Cui NJ; Min HQ
    Ai Zheng; 2002 Jun; 21(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 12452067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow cytometry of epidermoid lung carcinomas: relationship of ploidy and cell cycle phases to survival. A five-year follow up study.
    Volm M; Mattern J; Müller T; Drings P
    Anticancer Res; 1988; 8(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 3358625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relations of proliferative activities of gastric carcinoma cells to lymphatic involvement, venous invasion and prognosis.
    Wu YF; Xu HM; Chen JQ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2004 Oct; 117(10):1530-5. PubMed ID: 15498378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cell proliferation in ovarian carcinoma: superior accuracy of S-phase fraction (SPF) by DNA labeling index versus flow cytometric SPF, lack of independent prognostic power for SPF and DNA ploidy, and limited effect of SPF on tumor growth rate.
    Meyer JS; Gersell DJ; Yim S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jun; 81(3):466-76. PubMed ID: 11371140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overexpression of epithelial macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1) and CSF-1 receptor: a poor prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer, contrasted with a protective effect of stromal CSF-1.
    Chambers SK; Kacinski BM; Ivins CM; Carcangiu ML
    Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Jun; 3(6):999-1007. PubMed ID: 9815777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of static cytometry in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: recurrence rate and survival in a group of patients at 10 years follow-up.
    Cai T; Margallo E; Nesi G; Giubilei G; Rizzo M; Bartoletti R
    Oncol Rep; 2006 Jan; 15(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 16328058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proliferative characteristics of primary and metastatic human solid tumors by DNA flow cytometry.
    Frankfurt OS; Greco WR; Slocum HK; Arbuck SG; Gamarra M; Pavelic ZP; Rustum YM
    Cytometry; 1984 Nov; 5(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 6518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA content of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an independent prognostic indicator.
    Hsu MM; Chiou CR; Ko JY; Sheen TS; Hong RL; Ting LL
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2000; 24(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10917131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ampullary carcinoma: prognostic significance of ploidy, cell-cycle analysis and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA).
    Crucitti A; Masetti R; Breccia C; Coppola R; Magistrelli P; Nuzzo G; Maggiano N; Picciocchi A
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(26):1187-91. PubMed ID: 10370689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
    Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
    Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cellular DNA content on survival in advanced ovarian cancer.
    Friedlander ML; Hedley DW; Taylor IW; Russell P; Coates AS; Tattersall MH
    Cancer Res; 1984 Jan; 44(1):397-400. PubMed ID: 6690054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lack of prognostic significance of ploidy and S-phase measurements in advanced ovarian cancer.
    Coley HM; Sargent JM; Titley J; Taylor CG
    Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(3A):2111-6. PubMed ID: 10470157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic relevance of ploidy and proliferative activity evaluation by flow cytometry in poor prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
    De Lena M; Barletta A; Marzullo F; Lorusso V; Berardi F; Tommasi S; Mangia A; Paradiso A
    Haematologica; 1992; 77(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 1398287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.