These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films. Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of new radiographic screens for intraoral radiography. Dawood FF; Manson-Hing LR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Aug; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 289085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoral xeroradiography. White SC; Stafford ML; Beeninga LR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Dec; 46(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 282550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The optimum circular field size for dental radiography with intraoral films. van Straaten FJ; van Aken J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 6957831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems. Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography. Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging properties of intraoral dental xeroradiography. Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA; Jeromin LS J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Nov; 99(5):805-9. PubMed ID: 290676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed. Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries. Svenson B Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation of potential applications of intensifying screens in intraoral radiography. Stephens RG; Kogon SL; Reid JA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 6960313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality. Benz C; Mouyen F Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative approach to dose reduction in dental radiography. Webber RL; Schuette WH; Whitehouse WC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 Oct; 40(4):553-63. PubMed ID: 1058446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical trials of intraoral dental xeroradiography. White SC; Gratt BM J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Nov; 99(5):810-6. PubMed ID: 385665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-yield radiography of the maxillofacial complex using the free focus and conventional imaging concepts. The resolution performance of nonscreen and screen-film combinations. Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Sep; 56(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 6579466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Xeroradiography of dental structures. I. Preliminary investigations. Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Parks CP Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Jul; 44(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 267873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]