These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 362311)

  • 21. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ektaspeed and a screen/film system compared with Ultra-Speed in the interpretation of early proximal caries.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 50(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 6375836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New intraoral x-ray fluorographic imaging for dentistry.
    Higashi T; Osada T; Aoyama W; Iguchi M; Suzuki S; Kanno M; Moriya K; Yoshimura M; Tusuda M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Jun; 55(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 6576295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
    Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The determination of scattered radiation from intraoral x-ray examinations and its projected effects on image signal-to-noise ratio.
    Oishi T
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1981 Dec; 23(4):195-211. PubMed ID: 6955456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging.
    Webber RL; Horton RA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 9446991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging.
    Lundeen RC; McDavid WD; Barnwell GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Dec; 66(6):734-45. PubMed ID: 3205558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A comparison between endoral radiography and electronic magnification of digital orthopantomography].
    Nessi R; Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 7501826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computers in dental radiography: a scenario for the future.
    Webber RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Sep; 111(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 3930589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 2082410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation.
    Horner K; Shearer AC; Walker A; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 1990 Mar; 168(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 2182096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Panoramic radiography using an intraoral tube. Method, anatomy, radiography and dosimetry].
    Bianchi SD; Bonifacino M; Serrallonga M
    Minerva Stomatol; 1998 Apr; 47(4):169-81. PubMed ID: 9617129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.