These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 362311)

  • 41. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The free focus concept in dental and maxillofacial radiography. The present status of the miniaturized dental x-ray machines.
    Jensen TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Mar; 47(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 283359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [X-ray image detectors in stomatology].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 1998; (6):17-9. PubMed ID: 9949983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The bitewing roentgenogram and its diagnostic importance.
    Kaffe I; Ben-Amar A
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim; 1978 Apr; 27(2):21-6, 17-21. PubMed ID: 283057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Utility of radiology, laser fluorescence, and transillumination.
    Yang J; Dutra V
    Dent Clin North Am; 2005 Oct; 49(4):739-52, vi. PubMed ID: 16150314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Two dental x-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views.
    Kleier DJ; Benner SJ; Averbach RE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 3885130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Survey of dental radiographical practice in states of Punjab and Haryana in India.
    Sheikh S; Pallagatti S; Singla I; Gupta R; Aggarwal A; Singh R; Gupta D
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Feb; 5(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 23233351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
    Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Digital panoramic and extraoral imaging.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 8224331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diagnostic imaging assessment of experimental intraoral "folded film".
    Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 3475649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of filtration, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approximal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Parks ET; Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Williamson GF; Razmus TF; Bricker SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 8015809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds.
    Svenson B; Gröndahl HG; Petersson A; Olving A
    Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3859029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Are additional filters made of niobium superior to the copper filter in dental radiology?].
    Cordt I; Engelke W
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(10):1160-3. PubMed ID: 2237349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.