These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3623541)
1. [Logit analysis for comparison of treatment effects of categorical data]. Yang M; Yang Y Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1987 Jun; 18(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 3623541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Generalized variance component models for clustered categorical response variables. Miller ME; Landis JR Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 2049507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exact and resampling probability values for measures of categorical variation and consensus. Johnston JE; Berry KJ; Mielke PW Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Aug; 101(1):309-16. PubMed ID: 16350636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A mixed-effects model for categorical data. Beitler PJ; Landis JR Biometrics; 1985 Dec; 41(4):991-1000. PubMed ID: 3830263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical methods for analysing discrete and categorical data recorded in performance analysis. Nevill AM; Atkinson G; Hughes MD; Cooper SM J Sports Sci; 2002 Oct; 20(10):829-44. PubMed ID: 12363298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-response models with covariates. Wijesinha MC; Piantadosi S Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):977-87. PubMed ID: 7548713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bivariate categorical data analysis using normal linear conditional multinomial probability model. Sun B; Sutradhar B Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):469-86. PubMed ID: 25320019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some extensions of a linear model for categorical variables. Bonett DG; Woodward JA; Bentler PM Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 4074824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A variance components approach to categorical data models with heterogeneous cell populations: analysis of spatial gradients in lung cancer mortality rates in North Carolina counties. Manton KG; Woodbury MA; Stallard E Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 7272414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomization and the analysis of variance. White RF Biometrics; 1975 Jun; 31(2):555-71. PubMed ID: 1100135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling probability-based injury severity scores in logistic regression models: the logit transformation should be used. Moore L; Lavoie A; Bergeron E; Emond M J Trauma; 2007 Mar; 62(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 17414334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trimmed logit method for estimating the ED50 in quantal bioassay. Sanathanan LP; Gade ET; Shipkowitz NL Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 3427167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the bias of various estimators of the logit and its variance with application to quantal bioassay. Gart JJ; Zweifel JR Biometrika; 1967 Jun; 54(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 6049534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of ordinal categorical variables in skeletal assessment of sex from the cranium. Konigsberg LW; Hens SM Am J Phys Anthropol; 1998 Sep; 107(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 9740304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. Pauker SG; Kassirer JP N Engl J Med; 1980 May; 302(20):1109-17. PubMed ID: 7366635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximum likelihood estimation of the kappa coefficient from bivariate logistic regression. Shoukri MM; Mian IU Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1409-19. PubMed ID: 8841651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The analysis of longitudinal polytomous data: generalized estimating equations and connections with weighted least squares. Miller ME; Davis CS; Landis JR Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1033-44. PubMed ID: 8117899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Representational economy, not processing speed, determines preferred processing strategy of visual patterns. Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 20381784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects. Saneyoshi A; Michimata C Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19800727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of crash severities using nested logit model--accounting for the underreporting of crashes. Patil S; Geedipally SR; Lord D Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():646-53. PubMed ID: 22269553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]