These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36236247)

  • 41. A Rigorous Observation Model for the Risley Prism-Based Livox Mid-40 Lidar Sensor.
    Brazeal RG; Wilkinson BE; Hochmair HH
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Real-Time Hybrid Multi-Sensor Fusion Framework for Perception in Autonomous Vehicles.
    Shahian Jahromi B; Tulabandhula T; Cetin S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31600922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Navigating an Automated Driving Vehicle via the Early Fusion of Multi-Modality.
    Haris M; Glowacz A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Onboard Sensors-Based Self-Localization for Autonomous Vehicle With Hierarchical Map.
    Xia C; Shen Y; Yang Y; Deng X; Chen S; Xin J; Zheng N
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2023 Jul; 53(7):4218-4231. PubMed ID: 35316200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Enhancing Deep Learning-Based Segmentation Accuracy through Intensity Rendering and 3D Point Interpolation Techniques to Mitigate Sensor Variability.
    Kim MJ; Kim S; Lee B; Kim J
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 39065873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Low-Cost Curb Detection and Localization System Using Multiple Ultrasonic Sensors.
    Rhee JH; Seo J
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 30901833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Multiple Event-Based Simulation Scenario Generation Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Smart Sensors and Devices.
    Park J; Wen M; Sung Y; Cho K
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31615164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. MmWave Radar and Vision Fusion for Object Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Review.
    Wei Z; Zhang F; Chang S; Liu Y; Wu H; Feng Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An Analytic Model for Negative Obstacle Detection with Lidar and Numerical Validation Using Physics-Based Simulation.
    Goodin C; Carrillo J; Monroe JG; Carruth DW; Hudson CR
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 34063133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Human-like Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles at the Intersection Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning.
    Wu Z; Qu F; Yang L; Gong J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Exploring the associations between driving volatility and autonomous vehicle hazardous scenarios: Insights from field operational test data.
    Yu R; Li S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106537. PubMed ID: 34952369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Benchmarking 2D Multi-Object Detection and Tracking Algorithms in Autonomous Vehicle Driving Scenarios.
    Gragnaniello D; Greco A; Saggese A; Vento M; Vicinanza A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perception, Positioning and Decision-Making Algorithms Adaptation for an Autonomous Valet Parking System Based on Infrastructure Reference Points Using One Single LiDAR.
    Jiménez F; Clavijo M; Cerrato A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. 3D Object Detection for Self-Driving Cars Using Video and LiDAR: An Ablation Study.
    Salmane PH; Rivera Velázquez JM; Khoudour L; Mai NAM; Duthon P; Crouzil A; Pierre GS; Velastin SA
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. CLAD: A realistic Continual Learning benchmark for Autonomous Driving.
    Verwimp E; Yang K; Parisot S; Hong L; McDonagh S; Pérez-Pellitero E; De Lange M; Tuytelaars T
    Neural Netw; 2023 Apr; 161():659-669. PubMed ID: 36841037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard.
    Haider A; Cho Y; Pigniczki M; Köhler MH; Haas L; Kastner L; Fink M; Schardt M; Cichy Y; Koyama S; Zeh T; Poguntke T; Inoue H; Jakobi M; Koch AW
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development and Experimental Validation of an Intelligent Camera Model for Automated Driving.
    Genser S; Muckenhuber S; Solmaz S; Reckenzaun J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. OctoPath: An OcTree-Based Self-Supervised Learning Approach to Local Trajectory Planning for Mobile Robots.
    Trăsnea B; Ginerică C; Zaha M; Măceşanu G; Pozna C; Grigorescu S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 34067237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Machine Learning Approach to Pedestrian Detection for Autonomous Vehicles Using High-Definition 3D Range Data.
    Navarro PJ; Fernández C; Borraz R; Alonso D
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 28025565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Potential risk assessment for safe driving of autonomous vehicles under occluded vision.
    Wang D; Fu W; Song Q; Zhou J
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4981. PubMed ID: 35322105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.