These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36236495)

  • 21. Autonomous driving testing scenario generation based on in-depth vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler crash data in China.
    Wang X; Peng Y; Xu T; Xu Q; Wu X; Xiang G; Yi S; Wang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106812. PubMed ID: 36054982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of Lane-Changing Decision-Making Behavior of Autonomous Vehicles Based on Molecular Dynamics.
    Qu D; Zhang K; Song H; Wang T; Dai S
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. EMPC with adaptive APF of obstacle avoidance and trajectory tracking for autonomous electric vehicles.
    Yang H; Wang Z; Xia Y; Zuo Z
    ISA Trans; 2023 Apr; 135():438-448. PubMed ID: 36154777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Research on Lane Changing Game and Behavioral Decision Making Based on Driving Styles and Micro-Interaction Behaviors.
    Ye M; Li P; Yang Z; Liu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multi-Modal Vehicle Trajectory Prediction by Collaborative Learning of Lane Orientation, Vehicle Interaction, and Intention.
    Tian W; Wang S; Wang Z; Wu M; Zhou S; Bi X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Review of the Motion Planning and Control Methods for Automated Vehicles.
    Song X; Gao H; Ding T; Gu Y; Liu J; Tian K
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(13):. PubMed ID: 37447989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Apollo: Adaptive Polar Lattice-Based Local Obstacle Avoidance and Motion Planning for Automated Vehicles.
    Li Y; Chen Z; Wang T; Zeng X; Yin Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recognition Method of Vehicle Cluster Situation Based on Set Pair Logic considering Driver's Cognition.
    Liu S; Wang X; Bai C; Shi H; Zhang Y; Zhong F; Liu Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():9809279. PubMed ID: 34527047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shared Steering Control for Lane Keeping and Obstacle Avoidance Based on Multi-Objective MPC.
    Liang Y; Yin Z; Nie L
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clothoid: An Integrated Hierarchical Framework for Autonomous Driving in a Dynamic Urban Environment.
    Arshad S; Sualeh M; Kim D; Nam DV; Kim GW
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32899543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Drivers' Visual Behavior-Guided RRT Motion Planner for Autonomous On-Road Driving.
    Du M; Mei T; Liang H; Chen J; Huang R; Zhao P
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jan; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 26784203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach.
    Zhu J; Ma Y; Lou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106546. PubMed ID: 34965492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-modality trajectory prediction with the dynamic spatial interaction among vehicles under connected vehicle environment.
    Jin L; Liu X; Wang Y; Han Z; Guo B; Luo G; Xu X
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):2873. PubMed ID: 38311625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A novel approach of overtaking maneuvering using modified RG method.
    Ghumman U; Jabbar H; Tiwana MI; Khalil IU; Kunwar F
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0260455. PubMed ID: 35051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intersection Vehicle Turning Control for Fully Autonomous Driving Scenarios.
    Ding Z; Sun C; Zhou M; Liu Z; Wu C
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34207889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Collision-free emergency planning and control methods for CAVs considering intentions of surrounding vehicles.
    Zhao S; Zhang J; He C; Huang M; Ji Y; Liu W
    ISA Trans; 2023 May; 136():535-547. PubMed ID: 36371261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Game Algorithm of Intelligent Driving Vehicle Based on Left-Turn Scene of Crossroad Traffic Flow.
    Guo Z; Sun D; Zhou L
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9318475. PubMed ID: 36120691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimal eco-driving scheme for reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions on curved roads.
    Bakibillah ASM; Kamal MAS; Tan CP; Hayakawa T; Imura JI
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23586. PubMed ID: 38173479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles Based on an Improved Velocity Obstacle Method.
    Zhang W; Wei S; Teng Y; Zhang J; Wang X; Yan Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Nov; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 29186878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.