These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36236917)

  • 1. Lidar system with a fast scanning speed for sea fog detection.
    Xu W; Yang H; Sun D; Qi X; Xian J
    Opt Express; 2022 Jul; 30(15):27462-27471. PubMed ID: 36236917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parameter optimization of a visibility LiDAR for sea-fog early warnings.
    Xian J; Sun D; Amoruso S; Xu W; Wang X
    Opt Express; 2020 Aug; 28(16):23829-23845. PubMed ID: 32752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel Lidar algorithm for horizontal visibility measurement and sea fog monitoring.
    Xian J; Han Y; Huang S; Sun D; Zheng J; Han F; Zhou A; Yang S; Xu W; Song Q; Wei L; Tan Q; Li X
    Opt Express; 2018 Dec; 26(26):34853-34863. PubMed ID: 30650902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demonstration of measuring sea fog with an SNSPD-based Lidar system.
    Zhu J; Chen Y; Zhang L; Jia X; Feng Z; Wu G; Yan X; Zhai J; Wu Y; Chen Q; Zhou X; Wang Z; Zhang C; Kang L; Chen J; Wu P
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15113. PubMed ID: 29118415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laser and LIDAR in a System for Visibility Distance Estimation in Fog Conditions.
    Miclea RC; Dughir C; Alexa F; Sandru F; Silea I
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(21):. PubMed ID: 33167586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coastal Visibility Distance Estimation Using Dark Channel Prior and Distance Map Under Sea-Fog: Korean Peninsula Case.
    Bae TW; Han JH; Kim KJ; Kim YT
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31614905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fiber laser-based scanning lidar for space rendezvous and docking.
    Luo Y; He Y; Gao M; Zhou C; Zang H; Lei L; Xie K; Yang Y; Shi W; Hou X; Chen W
    Appl Opt; 2015 Mar; 54(9):2470-6. PubMed ID: 25968536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.
    Brooks JO; Crisler MC; Klein N; Goodenough R; Beeco RW; Guirl C; Tyler PJ; Hilpert A; Miller Y; Grygier J; Burroughs B; Martin A; Ray R; Palmer C; Beck C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):698-705. PubMed ID: 21376857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reshaping Field of View and Resolution with Segmented Reflectors: Bridging the Gap Between Rotating and Solid-State LiDARs.
    Aalerud A; Dybedal J; Subedi D
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32549400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extrinsic LiDAR/Ground Calibration Method Using 3D Geometrical Plane-Based Estimation.
    Zaiter MA; Lherbier R; Faour G; Bazzi O; Noyer JC
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 32429427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle's LiDAR Detection Performance Degradation for Actual Road Driving in Rain and Fog.
    Kim J; Park BJ; Kim J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evaluation of fog warning system.
    Al-Ghamdi AS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Nov; 39(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17920827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental Validation of LiDAR Sensors Used in Vehicular Applications by Using a Mobile Platform for Distance and Speed Measurements.
    Vasile I; Tudor E; Sburlan IC; Gheți MA; Popa G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34884154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Probabilistic Approach to Estimating Allowed SNR Values for Automotive LiDARs in "Smart Cities" under Various External Influences.
    Meshcheryakov R; Iskhakov A; Mamchenko M; Romanova M; Uvaysov S; Amirgaliyev Y; Gromaszek K
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensing with Polarized LIDAR in Degraded Visibility Conditions Due to Fog and Low Clouds.
    Ronen A; Agassi E; Yaron O
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33916764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasonable driving speed limits based on recognition time in a dynamic low-visibility environment related to fog-A driving simulator study.
    Wang K; Zhang W; Feng Z; Yu H; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106060. PubMed ID: 33706024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mean characteristics of lidar signals from broken clouds.
    Zuev VE; Krekov GM; Krekova MM; Titov GA
    Appl Opt; 1987 Aug; 26(15):3018-25. PubMed ID: 20490004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of connected vehicle-based variable speed limit under different foggy conditions based on simulated driving.
    Zhao X; Xu W; Ma J; Li H; Chen Y; Rong J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():206-216. PubMed ID: 31055185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A New Application of Unsupervised Learning to Nighttime Sea Fog Detection.
    Shin D; Kim JH
    Asia Pac J Atmos Sci; 2018; 54(4):527-544. PubMed ID: 30524666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lidar in-space technology experiment measurements of sea surface directional reflectance and the link to surface wind speed.
    Menzies RT; Tratt DM; Hunt WH
    Appl Opt; 1998 Aug; 37(24):5550-9. PubMed ID: 18286039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.