156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36237893)
1. Relationship between changes in physical function parameters and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Takenaka H; Sugiura H; Kamiya M; Nishihama K; Ito A; Suzuki J; Kawamura M; Hanamura S
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 84(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 36237893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of walking ability after surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study.
Takenaka H; Sugiura H; Kamiya M; Nishihama K; Ito A; Suzuki J; Kawamura M; Hanamura S; Hanamura H
Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1824-1831. PubMed ID: 31302266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Negative impact of spinal epidural lipomatosis on the surgical outcome of posterior lumbar spinous-splitting decompression surgery: a multicenter retrospective study.
Fujita N; Ishihara S; Michikawa T; Suzuki S; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Okada E; Yagi M; Tsuji T; Kono H; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Watanabe K
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 31254650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study of the interrelationship between subjective and objective measures of disability before and 2 months after lumbar decompression surgery for disc herniation.
Mannion AF; Dvorak J; Müntener M; Grob D
Eur Spine J; 2005 Jun; 14(5):454-65. PubMed ID: 15830214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of machine learning-based predictive model for clinical outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Yagi M; Michikawa T; Yamamoto T; Iga T; Ogura Y; Tachibana A; Miyamoto A; Suzuki S; Nori S; Takahashi Y; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Kono H; Ogawa J; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Watanabe K;
Spine J; 2022 Nov; 22(11):1768-1777. PubMed ID: 35760319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of surgical treatment on polypharmacy of elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: retrospective exploratory research.
Nagai S; Inagaki R; Michikawa T; Kawabata S; Ito K; Hachiya K; Takeda H; Ikeda D; Kaneko S; Yamada S; Fujita N
BMC Geriatr; 2023 Mar; 23(1):169. PubMed ID: 36964497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving effect of microendoscopic decompression surgery on low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and predictive factors of postoperative residual low back pain: a single-center retrospective study.
Taiji R; Iwasaki H; Hashizume H; Yukawa Y; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Tsutsui S; Takami M; Nagata K; Murata S; Kozaki T; Yoshida M; Yamada H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):954. PubMed ID: 34781941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 10-year Longitudinal MRI Study of Intervertebral Disk Degeneration in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis After Posterior Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
Fujii T; Daimon K; Ozaki M; Suzuki S; Takahashi Y; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Yagi M; Michikawa T; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Watanabe K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jun; 48(12):815-824. PubMed ID: 37026757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term effectiveness of precise safety decompression via double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.
Wang Y; Deng M; Wu H; Wu Y; Guo C; Zhang D; Kong Q
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jan; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 33446166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) for Predicting Poor Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
Watanabe K; Otani K; Nikaido T; Kato K; Kobayashi H; Handa J; Yabuki S; Kikuchi SI; Konno SI
Pain Res Manag; 2021; 2021():2589865. PubMed ID: 34970359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative psychological factors affecting surgical satisfaction of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kitano Cp T; Kawakami M; Fukui D; Ishimoto Y; Nagata K; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y
J Orthop Sci; 2020 Sep; 25(5):751-756. PubMed ID: 31806423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Loske S; Nüesch C; Byrnes KS; Fiebig O; Schären S; Mündermann A; Netzer C
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29709554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
