121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3623916)
41. The influence of self-absorption on PET and PET/CT shielding requirements.
Elschot M; de Wit TC; de Jong HW
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2999-3007. PubMed ID: 20632612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Surveyed data for structural shielding calculations of radiographic x-ray installations in Taiwan.
Chen TR; Tyan YS; Chu CH; Wu MC; Tung CJ
Health Phys; 2013 May; 104(5 Suppl 2):S60-7. PubMed ID: 23528275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of lead equivalence of patient and hardware materials in medical diagnostic x-ray shielding.
Okunade AA
Health Phys; 2005 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):S34-43. PubMed ID: 15654244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Use of gypsum wallboard for diagnostic X-ray protective barriers.
Glaze SA; Schneiders NJ; Bushong SC
Health Phys; 1979 May; 36(5):587-93. PubMed ID: 489312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Secondary shielding barriers for diagnostic x-ray facilities: scatter and leakage revisited.
Simpkin DJ; Dixon RL
Health Phys; 1998 Mar; 74(3):350-65. PubMed ID: 9482601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A general solution to the shielding of medical x and gamma rays by the NCRP Report No. 49 methods.
Simpkin DJ
Health Phys; 1987 Apr; 52(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 3570785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Brachytherapy structural shielding calculations using Monte Carlo generated, monoenergetic data.
Zourari K; Peppa V; Ballester F; Siebert FA; Papagiannis P
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):043901. PubMed ID: 24694161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of the CT scatter fractions provided in NCRP Report No. 147 to scanner-specific scatter fractions and the consequences for calculated barrier thickness.
Larson SC; Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson LS
Health Phys; 2007 Aug; 93(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17622822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Dosimetric shield evaluation with tungsten sheet in 4, 6, and 9MeV electron beams.
Fujimoto T; Monzen H; Nakata M; Okada T; Yano S; Takakura T; Kuwahara J; Sasaki M; Higashimura K; Hiraoka M
Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):838-42. PubMed ID: 24953537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P
Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An investigation of dose changes for therapeutic kilovoltage X-ray beams with underlying lead shielding.
Hill R; Healy B; Holloway L; Baldock C
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3045-53. PubMed ID: 17822012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Shielding Ability of Novel Tungsten Rubber Against the Electron Beam for Clinical Use in Radiation Therapy.
Kijima K; Monzen H; Matsumoto K; Tamura M; Nishimura Y
Anticancer Res; 2018 Jul; 38(7):3919-3927. PubMed ID: 29970513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Albedos for 4-, 10-, and 18-MV bremsstrahlung x-ray beams on concrete, iron, and lead--normally incident.
Lo YC
Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):659-66. PubMed ID: 1324391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The use of plate glass as shielding material in diagnostic radiologic installations.
Trout ED; Kelley JP; Larson VL
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Sep; 25(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 4425265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of transmission data of diagnostic X rays through concrete using Monte Carlo simulation.
Noto K; Koshida K; Iida H; Fukuda A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(3):144-52. PubMed ID: 19307234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Ulexite-galena intermediate-weight concrete as a novel design for overcoming space and weight limitations in the construction of efficient shields against neutrons and photons.
Aghamiri SM; Mortazavi SM; Razi Z; Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi M; Rahmani F; Faeghi F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 23019599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A conversion method of air kerma from the primary, scatter, and leakage radiations to effective dose for calculating x-ray shielding barriers in mammography.
Kharrati H
Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1367-74. PubMed ID: 15984688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Technical note: the measurement of mammographic room protection.
Johnson CH; Walker A
Br J Radiol; 1994 May; 67(797):494-6. PubMed ID: 8193898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
