204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36239188)
1. Clinical Ocular Biomechanics: Where Are We after 20 Years of Progress?
Yuhas PT; Roberts CJ
Curr Eye Res; 2023 Feb; 48(2):89-104. PubMed ID: 36239188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel dynamic corneal response parameters in a practice use: a critical review.
Jędzierowska M; Koprowski R
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Feb; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 30760270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vivo high-speed biomechanical imaging of the cornea using Corvis ST and digital image correlation.
Wang B; Yang L; Cheng J; Wang J; Mei Y
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Feb; 153():106540. PubMed ID: 36646022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters : A praxis-related overview].
Herber R; Terai N; Pillunat KR; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Spörl E
Ophthalmologe; 2018 Aug; 115(8):635-643. PubMed ID: 29767348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical contribution of the sclera to dynamic corneal response in air-puff induced deformation in human donor eyes.
Nguyen BA; Reilly MA; Roberts CJ
Exp Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 191():107904. PubMed ID: 31883460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanics of the keratoconic cornea: Theory, segmentation, pressure distribution, and coupled FE-optimization algorithm.
Rahmati SM; Razaghi R; Karimi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jan; 113():104155. PubMed ID: 33125958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Review of Corneal Biomechanics and Scleral Stiffness in Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy for Glaucoma.
Shen SR; Fleming GP; Jain SG; Roberts CJ
Curr Eye Res; 2023 Feb; 48(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 35929977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach.
Elhusseiny AM; Scarcelli G; Saeedi OJ
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 37892838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of accurately assessing biomechanics of the cornea.
Roberts CJ
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 27152485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Importance and use of corneal biomechanics and its diagnostic utility.
Ramirez-Miranda A; Mangwani-Mordani S; Arteaga-Rivera JY; Ambrosio R; Navas A; Graue-Hernandez EO; Valdez-Garcia JE
Cir Cir; 2023; 91(6):848-857. PubMed ID: 38096874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer.
Terai N; Raiskup F; Haustein M; Pillunat LE; Spoerl E
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jul; 37(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 22559332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal biomechanics and diagnostics: a review.
Komninou MA; Seiler TG; Enzmann V
Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 44(1):132. PubMed ID: 38478103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical corneal properties in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension measured with dynamic scheimpflug analyzer.
Martínez-Sánchez MI; Bolívar G; Sideroudi H; Teus MA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 260(12):3927-3933. PubMed ID: 35841397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics in Keratoconus Diagnosis.
Esporcatte LPG; Salomão MQ; Lopes BT; Sena N; Ferreira É; Filho JBRF; Machado AP; Ambrósio R
Curr Eye Res; 2023 Feb; 48(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 35184637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic corneal deformation response and integrated corneal tomography.
Salomão MQ; Hofling-Lima AL; Faria-Correia F; Lopes BT; Rodrigues-Barros S; Roberts CJ; Ambrósio R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 66(3):373-382. PubMed ID: 29480246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review.
Vellara HR; Patel DV
Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Jan; 98(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 25545947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative assessment of corneal vibrations during intraocular pressure measurement with the air-puff method in patients with keratoconus.
Koprowski R; Ambrósio R
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Nov; 66():170-8. PubMed ID: 26410602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and healthy controls using Corvis® Scheimpflug Technology.
Pradhan ZS; Deshmukh S; Dixit S; Gudetti P; Devi S; Webers CAB; Rao HL
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 68(5):787-792. PubMed ID: 32317447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J
J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus.
Ziaei M; Vellara HR; Gokul A; Ali NQ; McGhee CNJ; Patel DV
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 48(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 31705767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
