These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36240242)

  • 1. Signalling in auctions for risk-averse bidders.
    Bos O; Gomez-Martinez F; Onderstal S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275709. PubMed ID: 36240242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Efficiency of All-Pay Mechanisms.
    Christodoulou G; Sgouritsa A; Tang B
    Algorithmica; 2018; 80(4):1115-1145. PubMed ID: 31983796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition in the economic crisis: Analysis of procurement auctions.
    Gugler K; Weichselbaumer M; Zulehner C
    Eur Econ Rev; 2015 Jan; 73():35-57. PubMed ID: 25673884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of victory: social origins of the winner's curse in common value auctions.
    van den Bos W; Li J; Lau T; Maskin E; Cohen JD; Montague PR; McClure SM
    Judgm Decis Mak; 2008 Oct; 3(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 20305741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dataset collected in a lab experiment for the Generalized Second Price auction.
    Bae J; Kagel JH
    Data Brief; 2019 Oct; 26():104469. PubMed ID: 31667236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Going, going, gone: competitive decision-making in Dutch auctions.
    Bennett M; Mullard R; Adam MTP; Steyvers M; Brown S; Eidels A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Nov; 5(1):62. PubMed ID: 33252772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolutionary dynamics of biological auctions.
    Chatterjee K; Reiter JG; Nowak MA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Feb; 81(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 22120126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auction mechanism on construction land quota with selection on land location.
    Deng Y; Meng W; Huang B; Liu J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0263075. PubMed ID: 35077492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bidding process in online auctions and winning strategy: Rate equation approach.
    Yang I; Kahng B
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Jun; 73(6 Pt 2):067101. PubMed ID: 16907028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smarter than others? Conjectures in lowest unique bid auctions.
    Zhou C; Dong H; Hu R; Chen Q
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122923. PubMed ID: 25849631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. China's Land Market Auctions: Evidence of Corruption?
    Cai H; Henderson JV; Zhang Q
    Rand J Econ; 2013; 44(3):488-521. PubMed ID: 25506125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Privacy-preserving Quantum Sealed-bid Auction Based on Grover's Search Algorithm.
    Shi RH; Zhang M
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7626. PubMed ID: 31110220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combinatorial auction design.
    Porter D; Rassenti S; Roopnarine A; Smith V
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Sep; 100(19):11153-7. PubMed ID: 12893875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of competition on discrimination in online markets-Anonymity and selection.
    von Essen E; Karlsson J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221857. PubMed ID: 31461504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biological auctions with multiple rewards.
    Reiter JG; Kanodia A; Gupta R; Nowak MA; Chatterjee K
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 282(1812):20151041. PubMed ID: 26180069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rationality, irrationality and escalating behavior in lowest unique bid auctions.
    Radicchi F; Baronchelli A; Amaral LA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e29910. PubMed ID: 22279553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning and the possibility of losing own money reduce overbidding: Delayed payment in experimental auctions.
    Zhang YY; Nayga RM; Depositario DPT
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0213568. PubMed ID: 31120871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition strength influences individual preferences in an auction game.
    Toelch U; Jubera-Garcia E; Kurth-Nelson Z; Dolan RJ
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 25168161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk preference instability across institutions: a dilemma.
    Berg J; Dickhaut J; McCabe K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Mar; 102(11):4209-14. PubMed ID: 15753321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the design of competitive bidding in Medicare Advantage.
    Cawley JH; Whitford AB
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 32(2):317-47. PubMed ID: 17463410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.