139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36240714)
1. Adaptive response mechanisms of granular and flocculent sulfate-reducing sludge toward acidic multi-metal-laden wastewater.
Hao T
Water Res; 2022 Nov; 226():119227. PubMed ID: 36240714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. pH-dependent biological sulfidogenic processes for metal-laden wastewater treatment: Sulfate reduction or sulfur reduction?
Guo J; Li Y; Sun J; Sun R; Zhou S; Duan J; Feng W; Liu G; Jiang F
Water Res; 2021 Oct; 204():117628. PubMed ID: 34507021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of sulfate-reducing granular sludge in the SANI(®) process.
Hao T; Wei L; Lu H; Chui H; Mackey HR; van Loosdrecht MC; Chen G
Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(19):7042-52. PubMed ID: 24200003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in sulfate-reducing flocculent and granular sludge systems.
Qiu LQ; Zhang L; Tang K; Chen G; Kumar Khanal S; Lu H
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Sep; 288():121592. PubMed ID: 31176940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress-responses of activated sludge and anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria sludge under long-term ciprofloxacin exposure.
Zhang H; Song S; Jia Y; Wu D; Lu H
Water Res; 2019 Nov; 164():114964. PubMed ID: 31419666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rational design of sulfidogenic granular sludge reactor with clostridia as dominant bacteria for energy-efficient sulfate-laden wastewater treatment.
Biswal BK; Wang B; Chen L; Chen GH; Wu D
Bioresour Technol; 2020 Dec; 317():124017. PubMed ID: 32822894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Characteristics of Denitrification Inhibiting Sulfate Reducing Process].
Jin PK; Yang ZR; Li R; Li Y; Zhou LH
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2017 May; 38(5):1982-1990. PubMed ID: 29965104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resistance and resilience of nitrifying bacteria in aerobic granules to pH shock.
Liu YQ; Lan GH; Zeng P
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jul; 61(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 25900745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicochemical and biological characterization of long-term operated sulfate reducing granular sludge in the SANI® process.
Hao T; Luo J; Wei L; Mackey HR; Liu R; Rey Morito G; Chen GH
Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():74-84. PubMed ID: 25600299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. System evaluation and microbial analysis of a sulfur cycle-based wastewater treatment process for Co-treatment of simple wet flue gas desulfurization wastes with freshwater sewage.
Qian J; Liu R; Wei L; Lu H; Chen GH
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():189-99. PubMed ID: 26001823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhance the treatment of low strength wastewater at low temperature with the coexistence system of AnAOB and heterotrophic bacteria: Performance and bacterial community.
Lv Y; Pan J; Huo T; Li J; Liu S
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136799. PubMed ID: 31982768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An assessment of sulfate reducing bacteria on treating sulfate-rich metal-laden wastewater from electroplating plant.
Hu K; Xu D; Chen Y
J Hazard Mater; 2020 Jul; 393():122376. PubMed ID: 32114127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic microbial taxa in anaerobic bioreactors from industrial wastewater treatment plants using next-generation sequencing and gene clone library analyses.
Jantharadej K; Mhuantong W; Limpiyakorn T; Mongkolsuk S; Sirikanchana K; Suwannasilp BB
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2020; 55(11):1283-1293. PubMed ID: 32657213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resilience of sulfate-reducing granular sludge against temperature, pH, oxygen, nitrite, and free nitrous acid.
Hao T; Mackey HR; Guo G; Liu R; Chen G
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Oct; 100(19):8563-72. PubMed ID: 27294382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of metals on activity and community of sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichments and the discovery of a new heavy metal-resistant SRB from Santos Port sediment (São Paulo, Brazil).
Zampieri BDB; Nogueira EW; de Oliveira AJFC; Sánchez-Andrea I; Brucha G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(1):922-935. PubMed ID: 34341933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress responses of sulfate-reducing bacteria sludge upon exposure to polyethylene microplastics.
Tang M; Zhou S; Huang J; Sun L; Lu H
Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118646. PubMed ID: 35661505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Column experiments to assess the effects of electron donors on the efficiency of in situ precipitation of Zn, Cd, Co and Ni in contaminated groundwater applying the biological sulfate removal technology.
Geets J; Vanbroekhoven K; Borremans B; Vangronsveld J; Diels L; van der Lelie D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2006 Oct; 13(6):362-78. PubMed ID: 17120826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of diversity and activity of sulfate-reducing bacterial communities in sulfidogenic bioreactors using 16S rRNA and dsrB genes as molecular markers.
Dar SA; Yao L; van Dongen U; Kuenen JG; Muyzer G
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 73(2):594-604. PubMed ID: 17098925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sulfidogenic anaerobic digestion of sulfate-laden waste activated sludge: Evaluation on reactor performance and dynamics of microbial community.
Huang H; Biswal BK; Chen GH; Wu D
Bioresour Technol; 2020 Feb; 297():122396. PubMed ID: 31748132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pilot-scale sulfur-based sulfidogenic system for the treatment of Cu-laden electroplating wastewater using real domestic sewage as electron donor.
Li G; Liang Z; Sun J; Qiu Y; Qiu C; Liang X; Zhu Y; Wang P; Li Y; Jiang F
Water Res; 2021 May; 195():116999. PubMed ID: 33714911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
