These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3624087)

  • 1. Development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat.
    Lenoir M; Puel JL
    Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):265-71. PubMed ID: 3624087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further studies on the mechanics of the cochlear partition in the mustached bat. II. A second cochlear frequency map derived from acoustic distortion products.
    Kössl M; Vater M
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):78-86. PubMed ID: 8789813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of otoacoustic emissions in gerbil: evidence for micromechanical changes underlying development of the place code.
    Norton SJ; Bargones JY; Rubel EW
    Hear Res; 1991 Jan; 51(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 2013547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions].
    Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Makishima K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1997 Aug; 100(8):839-45. PubMed ID: 9293764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In search of basal distortion product generators.
    Withnell RH; Lodde J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2116-23. PubMed ID: 17069309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transient changes in cochlear potentials and DPOAEs after low-frequency tones: the 'two-minute bounce' revisited.
    Kirk DL; Patuzzi RB
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):49-68. PubMed ID: 9367229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The shape of 2f1-f2 suppression tuning curves reflects basilar membrane specializations in the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):151-60. PubMed ID: 7607981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitudes and latencies in the groups of older people with presbyacusis and young people with normal hearing].
    Namysłowski G; Morawski K; Urbaniec P; Lisowska G
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2000; 54(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 11070698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.