These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36240947)

  • 1. Event-related potentials of food-induced blindness in the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm.
    Kirsten H; Seib-Pfeifer LE; Schmuck J; Gibbons H
    Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106344. PubMed ID: 36240947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.
    MacLeod J; Stewart BM; Newman AJ; Arnell KM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):592-611. PubMed ID: 28265963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotional capture during emotion-induced blindness is not automatic.
    Hoffman JE; Kim M; Taylor M; Holiday K
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():140-158. PubMed ID: 31003713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2017; 13(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 28439320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.
    Demeter E; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 28(7):935-47. PubMed ID: 26967946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor-induced deafness: The effect of multiple auditory distractors on conscious target processing.
    Kern L; Niedeggen M
    Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():181-194. PubMed ID: 33279811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.
    Visser TA; Bischof WF; Di Lollo V
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1418-32. PubMed ID: 15813204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orbitofrontal cortex biases attention to emotional events.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Knight RT
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012; 34(6):588-97. PubMed ID: 22413757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food is special by itself: Neither valence, arousal, food appeal, nor caloric content modulate the attentional bias induced by food images.
    Ballestero-Arnau M; Moreno-Sánchez M; Cunillera T
    Appetite; 2021 Jan; 156():104984. PubMed ID: 33017592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of distractors in rapid serial visual presentation reveals the mechanism of attentional blink by EEG-based univariate and multivariate analyses.
    Meng Z; Chen Q; Zhou L; Xu L; Chen A
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Oct; 33(21):10761-10769. PubMed ID: 37702253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prior memory encoding of negative distractors biases emotion-induced blindness.
    Jia L; Zhao Y; Sung B; Cheng M; Wang X; Wang J
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(6):1116-1122. PubMed ID: 37287280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced frontal activation underlies sparing from the attentional blink: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Dell'Acqua R; Doro M; Dux PE; Losier T; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):623-33. PubMed ID: 26790988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotion-induced blindness reflects competition at early and late processing stages: an ERP study.
    Kennedy BL; Rawding J; Most SB; Hoffman JE
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 14(4):1485-98. PubMed ID: 24897955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.
    Zhao JL; Most SB
    Cogn Emot; 2019 May; 33(3):442-451. PubMed ID: 29644917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The modulation of task relevance on emotion-induced blindness depends on whether targets and distractors belong to the same category.
    Xu J; Pei Y; Yu Q; Zhang K; Ren Y
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Jul; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38953391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERP signatures of auditory awareness in cross-modal distractor-induced deafness.
    Kern L; Niedeggen M
    Conscious Cogn; 2021 Nov; 96():103241. PubMed ID: 34823076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of emotions on temporal attention.
    Mishra MV; Ray SB; Srinivasan N
    Prog Brain Res; 2017; 236():287-309. PubMed ID: 29157417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.