These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36241035)
1. Deduplicating records in systematic reviews: there are free, accurate automated ways to do so. Guimarães NS; Ferreira AJF; Ribeiro Silva RC; de Paula AA; Lisboa CS; Magno L; Ichiara MY; Barreto ML J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():110-115. PubMed ID: 36241035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module. Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 25588387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. McKeown S; Mir ZM Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):38. PubMed ID: 33485394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews. Hair K; Bahor Z; Macleod M; Liao J; Sena ES BMC Biol; 2023 Sep; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 37674179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automation of duplicate record detection for systematic reviews: Deduplicator. Forbes C; Greenwood H; Carter M; Clark J Syst Rev; 2024 Aug; 13(1):206. PubMed ID: 39095913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research. Borissov N; Haas Q; Minder B; Kopp-Heim D; von Gernler M; Janka H; Teodoro D; Amini P Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 11(1):172. PubMed ID: 35978441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. HÃ¥konsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: A follow-up study to evaluate the performance of various automated methods for reference de-duplication. McKeown S; Mir ZM Res Synth Methods; 2024 Nov; 15(6):896-904. PubMed ID: 39051574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abstract screening using the automated tool Rayyan: results of effectiveness in three diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. Valizadeh A; Moassefi M; Nakhostin-Ansari A; Hosseini Asl SH; Saghab Torbati M; Aghajani R; Maleki Ghorbani Z; Faghani S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):160. PubMed ID: 35655155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rule-based deduplication of article records from bibliographic databases. Jiang Y; Lin C; Meng W; Yu C; Cohen AM; Smalheiser NR Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014():bat086. PubMed ID: 24434031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of validated suicide outcome classification in observational studies. Swain RS; Taylor LG; Braver ER; Liu W; Pinheiro SP; Mosholder AD Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 48(5):1636-1649. PubMed ID: 30907424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An administrative data validation study of the accuracy of algorithms for identifying rheumatoid arthritis: the influence of the reference standard on algorithm performance. Widdifield J; Bombardier C; Bernatsky S; Paterson JM; Green D; Young J; Ivers N; Butt DA; Jaakkimainen RL; Thorne JC; Tu K BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jun; 15():216. PubMed ID: 24956925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods for systematic reviews of administrative database studies capturing health outcomes of interest. McPheeters ML; Sathe NA; Jerome RN; Carnahan RM Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K2-6. PubMed ID: 24331070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of algorithms to identify individuals with Neurofibromatosis type 1 within administrative data and electronic medical records in Ontario, Canada. Barnett C; Candido E; Chen B; Pequeno P; Parkin PC; Tu K Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Aug; 17(1):321. PubMed ID: 36028856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: a mixed method design. Cleo G; Scott AM; Islam F; Julien B; Beller E Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):145. PubMed ID: 31221212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic generation of case-detection algorithms to identify children with asthma from large electronic health record databases. Afzal Z; Engelkes M; Verhamme KM; Janssens HM; Sturkenboom MC; Kors JA; Schuemie MJ Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Aug; 22(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 23592573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Algorithms for Cardiovascular Death in Administrative Claims Databases: A Systematic Review. Singh S; Fouayzi H; Anzuoni K; Goldman L; Min JY; Griffin M; Grijalva CG; Morrow JA; Whitmore CC; Leonard CE; Selvan M; Nair V; Zhou Y; Toh S; Petrone A; Williams J; Fazio-Eynullayeva E; Swain R; Tyler Coyle D; Andrade S Drug Saf; 2019 Apr; 42(4):515-527. PubMed ID: 30471046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]