156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36241376)
1. Impact of implementing the aseptic compounding management system, Medcura, on internal error rates within an oncology pharmacy aseptic unit: a mixed methods evaluation.
Smith E; Fox A; Willmers G; Wright D; Stuart B
Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2024 Apr; 31(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 36241376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Errors associated with the preparation of aseptic products in UK hospital pharmacies: lessons from the national aseptic error reporting scheme.
Bateman R; Donyai P
Qual Saf Health Care; 2010 Oct; 19(5):e29. PubMed ID: 20427304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies implementation to reduce medicine preparation error rate in neonatal intensive care units.
Campino A; Santesteban E; Pascual P; Sordo B; Arranz C; Unceta M; Lopez-de-Heredia I
Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 175(6):755-65. PubMed ID: 26670025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of real-time data obtained from gravimetric preparation of antineoplastic agents shows medication errors with possible critical therapeutic impact: Results of a large-scale, multicentre, multinational, retrospective study.
Terkola R; Czejka M; Bérubé J
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2017 Aug; 42(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 28429389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Validation of aseptic technique of parenteral nutrition compounding in a pharmacy service according to USP Chapter 797].
Romero Jiménez RM; Pernía López MS; Sánchez Fresneda MN; Sanjurjo Sáez M
Nutr Hosp; 2013; 28(5):1494-7. PubMed ID: 24160206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravenous Chemotherapy Compounding Errors in a Follow-Up Pan-Canadian Observational Study.
Gilbert RE; Kozak MC; Dobish RB; Bourrier VC; Koke PM; Kukreti V; Logan HA; Easty AC; Trbovich PL
J Oncol Pract; 2018 May; 14(5):e295-e303. PubMed ID: 29676947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compounding & dispensing errors before and after implementing barcode technology in a nuclear pharmacy.
Galbraith W; Shadid J
Int J Pharm Compd; 2012; 16(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 23050303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbiological validation of a robot for the sterile compounding of injectable non-hazardous medications in a hospital environment.
Sabatini L; Paolucci D; Marinelli F; Pianetti A; Sbaffo M; Bufarini C; Sisti M
Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2020 Mar; 27(e1):e63-e68. PubMed ID: 32296508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of an i.v.-compounding robot in a hospital-based cancer center pharmacy.
Yaniv AW; Knoer SJ
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Nov; 70(22):2030-7. PubMed ID: 24173011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic dispensing improves patient safety, inventory management, and staff satisfaction in an outpatient hospital pharmacy.
Rodriguez-Gonzalez CG; Herranz-Alonso A; Escudero-Vilaplana V; Ais-Larisgoitia MA; Iglesias-Peinado I; Sanjurjo-Saez M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 30136339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for i.v. compounding errors when using an automated workflow management system.
Deng Y; Lin AC; Hingl J; Huang G; Altaye M; Maynard H; Mayhaus D; Penm J
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Jun; 73(12):887-93. PubMed ID: 27261239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observational study of accuracy in compounding i.v. admixtures at five hospitals.
Flynn EA; Pearson RE; Barker KN
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1997 Apr; 54(8):904-12. PubMed ID: 9114922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy.
Poon EG; Cina JL; Churchill W; Patel N; Featherstone E; Rothschild JM; Keohane CA; Whittemore AD; Bates DW; Gandhi TK
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):426-34. PubMed ID: 16983130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of two work practice changes on the microbial contamination rates of pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations.
Trissel LA; Gentempo JA; Saenz LM; Woodard MY; Angeles CH
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Apr; 64(8):837-41. PubMed ID: 17420200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation.
Bucci TG; Hedrick TL; Roberts PA; Lin K; South MD; Willoughby IR; Eckel SF; Hess ET; Eberwein S; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jul; 76(14):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 31361879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risks and medication errors analysis to evaluate the impact of a chemotherapy compounding workflow management system on cancer patients' safety.
Marzal-Alfaro M; Rodriguez-Gonzalez CG; Escudero-Vilaplana V; Revuelta-Herrero JL; González-Haba E; Ibáñez-Garcia S; Iglesias-Peinado I; Herranz-Alonso A; Sanjurjo Saez M
Health Informatics J; 2020 Sep; 26(3):1995-2010. PubMed ID: 31912756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying Lean Sigma solutions to mistake-proof the chemotherapy preparation process.
Aboumatar HJ; Winner L; Davis R; Peterson A; Hill R; Frank S; Almuete V; Leung TV; Trovitch P; Farmer D
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2010 Feb; 36(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 20180440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A virtual centralized cytotoxic preparation unit simulation to evaluate the pharmacy staff knowledge.
Cotteret C; Marry S; Loeuillet R; Videau M; Cisternino S; Schlatter J
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Jul; 25(5):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 30626271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parenteral product error detection before and after implementation of intravenous workflow management technology.
Wright KR; Dekarske B; Clark JS; Chaffee BW
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Jan; 25(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28776479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs.
Seger AC; Churchill WW; Keohane CA; Belisle CD; Wong ST; Sylvester KW; Chesnick MA; Burdick E; Wien MF; Cotugno MC; Bates DW; Rothschild JM
J Oncol Pract; 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349. PubMed ID: 23598843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
