These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36241436)

  • 1. Mapping the carbon footprint of milk production from cattle: A systematic review.
    Mazzetto AM; Falconer S; Ledgard S
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Nov; 105(12):9713-9725. PubMed ID: 36241436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.
    Robertson K; Symes W; Garnham M
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4279-93. PubMed ID: 25981064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of nitrate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on the carbon footprints of milk from cattle produced in confined-feeding systems across regions in the United States: A life cycle analysis.
    Uddin ME; Tricarico JM; Kebreab E
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5074-5083. PubMed ID: 35346477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk.
    Ledgard SF; Falconer SJ; Abercrombie R; Philip G; Hill JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):1031-1046. PubMed ID: 31759588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia.
    Feyissa AA; Senbeta F; Diriba D; Tolera A
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Dec; 54(6):411. PubMed ID: 36456660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
    O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
    O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of ecosystem services into the carbon footprint of milk of South German dairy farms.
    Robert Kiefer L; Menzel F; Bahrs E
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():11-8. PubMed ID: 25602922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Milk carbon footprint of silvopastoral dairy systems in the Northern Peruvian Amazon.
    Ruiz-Llontop D; Velarde-Guillén J; Fuentes E; Prudencio M; Gómez C
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Jul; 54(4):227. PubMed ID: 35809110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The carbon footprint of integrated milk production and renewable energy systems - A case study.
    Vida E; Tedesco DEA
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1286-1294. PubMed ID: 28793397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Greenhouse gas, water, and land footprint per unit of production of the California dairy industry over 50 years.
    Naranjo A; Johnson A; Rossow H; Kebreab E
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3760-3773. PubMed ID: 32037166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the impact of clinical mastitis in dairy cows on greenhouse gas emissions using a dynamic stochastic simulation model: a case study.
    Mostert PF; Bokkers EAM; de Boer IJM; van Middelaar CE
    Animal; 2019 Dec; 13(12):2913-2921. PubMed ID: 31210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options.
    Naranjo AM; Sieverding H; Clay D; Kebreab E
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0269076. PubMed ID: 36996025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from feed additive use in California dairy cattle.
    Feng X; Kebreab E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0234289. PubMed ID: 32946456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain.
    Laca A; Gómez N; Laca A; Díaz M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(2):1650-1666. PubMed ID: 31755063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome).
    Oliveira PPA; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Alves TC; Pezzopane JRM; Sakamoto LS; Henrique FL; Rodrigues PHM
    Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(S3):s427-s437. PubMed ID: 32829724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of feeding strategies and cropping systems on greenhouse gas emission from Wisconsin certified organic dairy farms.
    Liang D; Sun F; Wattiaux MA; Cabrera VE; Hedtcke JL; Silva EM
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5957-5973. PubMed ID: 28501399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through different dairy cattle systems in subtropical regions.
    Ribeiro-Filho HMN; Civiero M; Kebreab E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234687. PubMed ID: 32555654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment.
    González-Quintero R; Bolívar-Vergara DM; Chirinda N; Arango J; Pantevez H; Barahona-Rosales R; Sánchez-Pinzón MS
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145573. PubMed ID: 33940733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of feed demand on greenhouse gas emissions and farm profitability for organic and conventional dairy farms.
    Kiefer L; Menzel F; Bahrs E
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7564-74. PubMed ID: 25468708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.