127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36241558)
41. A Lymph Node Ratio-Based Staging Model Is Superior to the Current Staging System for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Gaitanidis A; Patel D; Nilubol N; Tirosh A; Kebebew E
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2018 Jan; 103(1):187-195. PubMed ID: 29069375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prognostic significance of classified extramural tumor deposits and extracapsular lymph node invasion in T3-4 colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
Yamano T; Semba S; Noda M; Yoshimura M; Kobayashi M; Hamanaka M; Beppu N; Yano A; Tsukamoto K; Matsubara N; Tomita N
BMC Cancer; 2015 Nov; 15():859. PubMed ID: 26545360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Tumour differentiation grade is associated with TNM staging and the risk of node metastasis in colorectal cancer.
Derwinger K; Kodeda K; Bexe-Lindskog E; Taflin H
Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 20001500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer.
Ren JQ; Liu JW; Chen ZT; Liu SJ; Huang SJ; Huang Y; Hong JS
Chin J Cancer; 2012 May; 31(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 22313594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Para-aortic node involvement is not an independent predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancer.
Sperti C; Gruppo M; Blandamura S; Valmasoni M; Pozza G; Passuello N; Beltrame V; Moletta L
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 23(24):4399-4406. PubMed ID: 28706422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Influence of number of removed lymph nodes on the TNM staging and survival in advanced esophageal carcinoma].
Chen LQ; Hu CY; Zhang HL; He M; Meng XL; Ping YM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 29(8):604-8. PubMed ID: 18210881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Distant metastases in colorectal carcinoma: A proposal for a new M1 subclassification.
Merkel S; Weber K; Croner RS; Golcher H; Göhl J; Agaimy A; Semrau S; Siebler J; Wein A; Hohenberger W; Wittekind C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1337-42. PubMed ID: 27160353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Predictive factors affecting survival in stage II colorectal cancer: is lymph node harvesting relevant?
Peeples C; Shellnut J; Wasvary H; Riggs T; Sacksner J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1517-23. PubMed ID: 20940600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer.
Wong KP; Poon JT; Fan JK; Law WL
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1116-22. PubMed ID: 20874800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The influence of nodal size on the staging of colorectal carcinomas.
Cserni G
J Clin Pathol; 2002 May; 55(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 11986347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A study of lymph node ratio in stage IV colorectal cancer.
Derwinger K; Gustavsson B
World J Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 6():127. PubMed ID: 19046414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Oncological Implications of Lymph Nodes Retrieval and Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: Outcomes from a Referral Center.
Vergara-Fernandez O; Navarro-Navarro A; Rangel-Ríos HA; Salgado-Nesme N; Reyes-Monroy JA; Velázquez-Fernández D
Rev Invest Clin; 2018; 70(6):291-300. PubMed ID: 30532087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Novel Methods of Lymph Node Evaluation for Predicting the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Inadequate Lymph Node Harvest.
Kwon TS; Choi SB; Lee YS; Kim JG; Oh ST; Lee IK
Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 48(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 25943323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Regional Lymph Nodes Status and Ratio of Metastatic to Examined Lymph Nodes Correlate with Survival in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.
Ahmed S; Leis A; Chandra-Kanthan S; Fields A; Zaidi A; Abbas T; Le D; Reeder B; Pahwa P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2287-94. PubMed ID: 27016291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Predictive Value of the Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes and Cut-Off for Lymph Node Ratio in the Prognosis of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Li Destri G; Barchitta M; Pesce A; Latteri S; Bosco D; Di Cataldo A; Agodi A; Puleo S
J Invest Surg; 2019 Jan; 32(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28972442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?
Lee SY; Hwang I; Park YS; Gardner J; Ro JY
Int J Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 20428770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer.
Yoo CH; Noh SH; Kim YI; Min JS
World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):492-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 10085399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prognostic factors for T1-2 colorectal cancer after radical resection: Lymph node distribution is a valuable predictor of its survival.
Huang X; Liu H; Liao X; Xiao Z; Huang Z; Li G
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):241-246. PubMed ID: 32792113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The intrathoracic lymph node ratio seems to be a better prognostic factor than the level of lymph node involvement in lung metastasectomy of colorectal carcinoma.
Renaud S; Falcoz PE; Olland A; Schaeffer M; Reeb J; Santelmo N; Massard G
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 20(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 25358477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Prognostic analysis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Chen J; Zhu K; Zheng X; Chen M; Lin Y; Pan C; Pan J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 36(8):612-6. PubMed ID: 25430029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]