BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36241558)

  • 41. A Lymph Node Ratio-Based Staging Model Is Superior to the Current Staging System for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
    Gaitanidis A; Patel D; Nilubol N; Tirosh A; Kebebew E
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2018 Jan; 103(1):187-195. PubMed ID: 29069375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prognostic significance of classified extramural tumor deposits and extracapsular lymph node invasion in T3-4 colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
    Yamano T; Semba S; Noda M; Yoshimura M; Kobayashi M; Hamanaka M; Beppu N; Yano A; Tsukamoto K; Matsubara N; Tomita N
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Nov; 15():859. PubMed ID: 26545360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tumour differentiation grade is associated with TNM staging and the risk of node metastasis in colorectal cancer.
    Derwinger K; Kodeda K; Bexe-Lindskog E; Taflin H
    Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 20001500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer.
    Ren JQ; Liu JW; Chen ZT; Liu SJ; Huang SJ; Huang Y; Hong JS
    Chin J Cancer; 2012 May; 31(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 22313594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Para-aortic node involvement is not an independent predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancer.
    Sperti C; Gruppo M; Blandamura S; Valmasoni M; Pozza G; Passuello N; Beltrame V; Moletta L
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 23(24):4399-4406. PubMed ID: 28706422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Influence of number of removed lymph nodes on the TNM staging and survival in advanced esophageal carcinoma].
    Chen LQ; Hu CY; Zhang HL; He M; Meng XL; Ping YM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 29(8):604-8. PubMed ID: 18210881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Distant metastases in colorectal carcinoma: A proposal for a new M1 subclassification.
    Merkel S; Weber K; Croner RS; Golcher H; Göhl J; Agaimy A; Semrau S; Siebler J; Wein A; Hohenberger W; Wittekind C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1337-42. PubMed ID: 27160353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Predictive factors affecting survival in stage II colorectal cancer: is lymph node harvesting relevant?
    Peeples C; Shellnut J; Wasvary H; Riggs T; Sacksner J
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1517-23. PubMed ID: 20940600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer.
    Wong KP; Poon JT; Fan JK; Law WL
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1116-22. PubMed ID: 20874800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The influence of nodal size on the staging of colorectal carcinomas.
    Cserni G
    J Clin Pathol; 2002 May; 55(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 11986347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A study of lymph node ratio in stage IV colorectal cancer.
    Derwinger K; Gustavsson B
    World J Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 6():127. PubMed ID: 19046414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Oncological Implications of Lymph Nodes Retrieval and Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: Outcomes from a Referral Center.
    Vergara-Fernandez O; Navarro-Navarro A; Rangel-Ríos HA; Salgado-Nesme N; Reyes-Monroy JA; Velázquez-Fernández D
    Rev Invest Clin; 2018; 70(6):291-300. PubMed ID: 30532087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Novel Methods of Lymph Node Evaluation for Predicting the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Inadequate Lymph Node Harvest.
    Kwon TS; Choi SB; Lee YS; Kim JG; Oh ST; Lee IK
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 48(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 25943323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Regional Lymph Nodes Status and Ratio of Metastatic to Examined Lymph Nodes Correlate with Survival in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.
    Ahmed S; Leis A; Chandra-Kanthan S; Fields A; Zaidi A; Abbas T; Le D; Reeder B; Pahwa P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2287-94. PubMed ID: 27016291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Predictive Value of the Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes and Cut-Off for Lymph Node Ratio in the Prognosis of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients.
    Li Destri G; Barchitta M; Pesce A; Latteri S; Bosco D; Di Cataldo A; Agodi A; Puleo S
    J Invest Surg; 2019 Jan; 32(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28972442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?
    Lee SY; Hwang I; Park YS; Gardner J; Ro JY
    Int J Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 20428770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer.
    Yoo CH; Noh SH; Kim YI; Min JS
    World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):492-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 10085399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prognostic factors for T1-2 colorectal cancer after radical resection: Lymph node distribution is a valuable predictor of its survival.
    Huang X; Liu H; Liao X; Xiao Z; Huang Z; Li G
    Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):241-246. PubMed ID: 32792113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The intrathoracic lymph node ratio seems to be a better prognostic factor than the level of lymph node involvement in lung metastasectomy of colorectal carcinoma.
    Renaud S; Falcoz PE; Olland A; Schaeffer M; Reeb J; Santelmo N; Massard G
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 20(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 25358477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Prognostic analysis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Chen J; Zhu K; Zheng X; Chen M; Lin Y; Pan C; Pan J
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 36(8):612-6. PubMed ID: 25430029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.