These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3624196)

  • 1. A survey of speech and other auditory perception assessment materials used by cochlear implant centers.
    Danhauer JL; Lucks LE; Abdala C
    J Aud Res; 1986 Apr; 26(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 3624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory neuropathy: an update.
    Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):102S-106S. PubMed ID: 17496659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear mini-system implantations in Mandarin-speaking patients.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8694134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Hearing and speech discrimination scores of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD; Egelierler B; Adunka O
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):492-7. PubMed ID: 10890127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages and disadvantages expected and realized by pediatric cochlear implant recipients as reported by their parents.
    Kelsay DM; Tyler RS
    Am J Otol; 1996 Nov; 17(6):866-73. PubMed ID: 8915415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory perception and speech production skills of children with cochlear implant assessed by means of questionnaire batteries.
    Kubo T; Iwaki T; Sasaki T
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 18467816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implants in five cases of auditory neuropathy: postoperative findings and progress.
    Shallop JK; Peterson A; Facer GW; Fabry LB; Driscoll CL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):555-62. PubMed ID: 11359119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary assessment of the Los Angeles, Vienna and Melbourne cochlear implants.
    McCabe BF; Tyler RS; Gantz BJ; Lowder MW; Otto SR; Preece JP
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():247-53. PubMed ID: 6596849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception with cochlear implants as measured using a roving-level adaptive test method.
    Haumann S; Lenarz T; Büchner A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 72(6):312-8. PubMed ID: 20847580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies.
    Brockmeier SJ; Grasmeder M; Passow S; Mawmann D; Vischer M; Jappel A; Baumgartner W; Stark T; Müller J; Brill S; Steffens T; Strutz J; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Arnold W
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):49S-51S. PubMed ID: 17496646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.