125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36242822)
1. Revisiting assessment factors for species sensitivity distributions as a function of sample size and variation in species sensitivity.
Kamo M; Hayashi TI; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Nov; 246():114170. PubMed ID: 36242822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method.
Sorgog K; Kamo M
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109494. PubMed ID: 31376805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advancing Fifth Percentile Hazard Concentration Estimation Using Toxicity-Normalized Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Dhond AK; Barron MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 56(23):17188-17196. PubMed ID: 36410104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions?
Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):13131-13136. PubMed ID: 32924457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 35502940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations.
Dyer SD; Versteeg DJ; Belanger SE; Chaney JG; Mayer FL
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 May; 40(9):3102-11. PubMed ID: 16719118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of species sensitivity distribution modeling approaches for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials - A case study for silver and titanium dioxide representative materials.
Sørensen SN; Wigger H; Zabeo A; Semenzin E; Hristozov D; Nowack B; Spurgeon DJ; Baun A
Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 225():105543. PubMed ID: 32585540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach to Derive Ecological Threshold of Toxicological Concern (eco-TTC) for Pesticides.
Rizzi C; Villa S; Cuzzeri AS; Finizio A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relative sensitivity of freshwater species to antimony(III): Implications for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments.
Obiakor MO; Tighe M; Wang Z; Ezeonyejiaku CD; Pereg L; Wilson SC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):25276-25290. PubMed ID: 28929352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116379. PubMed ID: 38714082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Interspecies Correlation Estimation (ICE) Models to Derive Water Quality Criteria of Microplastics for Protecting Aquatic Organisms.
Wu J; Zhao X; Gao L; Li Y; Wang D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deriving the predicted no effect concentrations of 35 pesticides by the QSAR-SSD method.
Huang P; Liu SS; Wang ZJ; Ding TT; Xu YQ
Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 298():134303. PubMed ID: 35288184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure pattern-specific species sensitivity distributions for the ecological risk assessments of insecticides.
Van den Brink PJ; Buijert-de Gelder DM; Brock TCM; Roessink I; Focks A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Sep; 180():252-258. PubMed ID: 31096128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating population-level HC5 for copper using a species sensitivity distribution approach.
Iwasaki Y; Hayashi TI; Kamo M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1396-402. PubMed ID: 23417717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.
Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Species sensitivity distribution for chlorpyrifos to aquatic organisms: Model choice and sample size.
Zhao J; Chen B
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Mar; 125():161-9. PubMed ID: 26701839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aquatic acute species sensitivity distributions of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles.
Adam N; Schmitt C; De Bruyn L; Knapen D; Blust R
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 526():233-42. PubMed ID: 25933293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecological risk assessment of nonylphenol in coastal waters of China based on species sensitivity distribution model.
Gao P; Li Z; Gibson M; Gao H
Chemosphere; 2014 Jun; 104():113-9. PubMed ID: 24268347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
