150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36243103)
1. Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hassan C; Piovani D; Spadaccini M; Parigi T; Khalaf K; Facciorusso A; Fugazza A; Rösch T; Bretthauer M; Mori Y; Sharma P; Rex DK; Bonovas S; Repici A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Feb; 97(2):212-225.e7. PubMed ID: 36243103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mohan BP; Khan SR; Daugherty E; Chandan S; Ponnada S; Facciorusso A; Kassab LL; Asokkumar R; Adler DG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Aug; 96(2):208-222.e14. PubMed ID: 35413330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic technological innovations for neoplasia detection in organized colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thayalasekaran S; Frazzoni L; Antonelli G; Fuccio L; Radaelli F; Andrealli A; Senore C; Repici A; Hassan C; Bhandari P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Oct; 92(4):840-847.e9. PubMed ID: 32590053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dye-based chromoendoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Antonelli G; Correale L; Spadaccini M; Maselli R; Bhandari P; Bisschops R; Cereatti F; Dekker E; East JE; Iacopini F; Jover R; Kiesslich R; Pellise M; Sharma P; Rex DK; Repici A; Hassan C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Sep; 96(3):411-422. PubMed ID: 35588768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in a fecal immunochemical test-based organized colorectal cancer screening program: a randomized controlled trial (AIFIT study).
Rondonotti E; Di Paolo D; Rizzotto ER; Alvisi C; Buscarini E; Spadaccini M; Tamanini G; Paggi S; Amato A; Scardino G; Romeo S; Alicante S; Ancona F; Guido E; Marzo V; Chicco F; Agazzi S; Rosa C; Correale L; Repici A; Hassan C; Radaelli F;
Endoscopy; 2022 Dec; 54(12):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 35545122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compared Abilities of Endoscopic Techniques to Increase Colon Adenoma Detection Rates: A Network Meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Triantafyllou K; Murad MH; Prokop LJ; Tziatzios G; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Nov; 17(12):2439-2454.e25. PubMed ID: 30529731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial.
Repici A; Badalamenti M; Maselli R; Correale L; Radaelli F; Rondonotti E; Ferrara E; Spadaccini M; Alkandari A; Fugazza A; Anderloni A; Galtieri PA; Pellegatta G; Carrara S; Di Leo M; Craviotto V; Lamonaca L; Lorenzetti R; Andrealli A; Antonelli G; Wallace M; Sharma P; Rosch T; Hassan C
Gastroenterology; 2020 Aug; 159(2):512-520.e7. PubMed ID: 32371116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.
Hassan C; Senore C; Radaelli F; De Pretis G; Sassatelli R; Arrigoni A; Manes G; Amato A; Anderloni A; Armelao F; Mondardini A; Spada C; Omazzi B; Cavina M; Miori G; Campanale C; Sereni G; Segnan N; Repici A
Gut; 2017 Nov; 66(11):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 27507903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenoma and Serrated Lesion Detection by Colonoscopy Indication: The ADR-ESS (ADR Extended to all Screening/Surveillance) Score.
Ladabaum U; Shepard J; Mannalithara A
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1873-1882. PubMed ID: 33895358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Triantafyllou K; Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Papanikolaou IS; Fuccio L; Hassan C
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(9):1158-1170. PubMed ID: 30863002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hassan C; Spadaccini M; Iannone A; Maselli R; Jovani M; Chandrasekar VT; Antonelli G; Yu H; Areia M; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Bhandari P; Sharma P; Rex DK; Rösch T; Wallace M; Repici A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Jan; 93(1):77-85.e6. PubMed ID: 32598963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adenoma detection by Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy in an organized screening program: the "ItaVision" randomized controlled trial.
Zorzi M; Hassan C; Battagello J; Antonelli G; Pantalena M; Bulighin G; Alicante S; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Iacopini F; Luigiano C; Monica F; Arrigoni A; Germanà B; Valiante F; Mallardi B; Senore C; Grazzini G; Mantellini P;
Endoscopy; 2022 Feb; 54(2):138-147. PubMed ID: 33524994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrograde inspection
Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-definition colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Lazaridis LD; Facciorusso A; Antonelli G; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 May; 91(5):1027-1036.e9. PubMed ID: 31954133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anesthesia Assistance in Screening Colonoscopy and Adenoma Detection Rate Among Trainees.
Krigel A; Patel A; Kaplan J; Kong XF; Garcia-Carrasquillo R; Lebwohl B; Krishnareddy S
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Apr; 65(4):961-968. PubMed ID: 31485995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 9-Minute Withdrawal Time Improves Adenoma Detection Rate Compared With 6-Minute Withdrawal Time During Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Aziz M; Haghbin H; Gangwani MK; Nawras M; Nawras Y; Dahiya DS; Sohail AH; Lee-Smith W; Kamal F; Shaukat A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 57(9):863-870. PubMed ID: 37389958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Fuccio L; Frazzoni L; Hassan C; La Marca M; Paci V; Smania V; De Bortoli N; Bazzoli F; Repici A; Rex D; Cadoni S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Oct; 88(4):589-597.e11. PubMed ID: 29981753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor?
Yang PF; Wong SW
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Apr; 26(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 26813239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
