138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36243143)
1. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Free-Hand and Fixed-Arm Spatial Tracking Methodologies in Software-Guided MRI-TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy Platforms.
Zhao CC; Rossi JK; Wysock JS
Urology; 2023 Jan; 171():16-22. PubMed ID: 36243143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of systematic prostate biopsies when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with needle tracking-what is the additional value?
Günzel K; Magheli A; Busch J; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Edler D; Schostak M; Borgmann H; Schlegel J; Hinz S
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2477-2483. PubMed ID: 35877030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Woo S; Suh CH; Eastham JA; Zelefsky MJ; Morris MJ; Abida W; Scher HI; Sidlow R; Becker AS; Wibmer AG; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):605-616. PubMed ID: 31204311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.
Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Laqua N; Klingebiel M; Martin O; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 30927932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):108-117. PubMed ID: 34428091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uleri A; Baboudjian M; Tedde A; Gallioli A; Long-Depaquit T; Palou J; Basile G; Gaya JM; Sanguedolce F; Lughezzani G; Rajwa P; Pradere B; Roupret M; Briganti A; Ploussard G; Breda A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 37634971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of standard systematic biopsy versus MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy using the Navigo® system in contemporary cohort.
Nativ O; Shefler A; Bejar J; Peschansky S; Lavi A; Michael C; Nativ O
Urol Oncol; 2024 May; 42(5):159.e1-159.e7. PubMed ID: 38431487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bass EJ; Pantovic A; Connor MJ; Loeb S; Rastinehad AR; Winkler M; Gabe R; Ahmed HU
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Feb; 25(2):174-179. PubMed ID: 34548624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates in patients undergoing MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with two different software-based systems.
Hanske J; Risse Y; Roghmann F; Pucheril D; Berg S; Tully KH; von Landenberg N; Wald J; Noldus J; Brock M
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 34734428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
