BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36243494)

  • 21. PET Imaging for Breast Cancer.
    Fowler AM; Cho SY
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Sep; 59(5):725-735. PubMed ID: 34392915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer.
    Linden HM; Stekhova SA; Link JM; Gralow JR; Livingston RB; Ellis GK; Petra PH; Peterson LM; Schubert EK; Dunnwald LK; Krohn KA; Mankoff DA
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jun; 24(18):2793-9. PubMed ID: 16682724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23.
    Grabher BJ
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2023 Sep; 51(3):188-193. PubMed ID: 37433673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A phase 1b study evaluating the effect of elacestrant treatment on estrogen receptor availability and estradiol binding to the estrogen receptor in metastatic breast cancer lesions using
    Jager A; de Vries EGE; der Houven van Oordt CWM; Neven P; Venema CM; Glaudemans AWJM; Wang Y; Bagley RG; Conlan MG; Aftimos P
    Breast Cancer Res; 2020 Sep; 22(1):97. PubMed ID: 32912274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Utility of
    Lin FI; Gonzalez EM; Kummar S; Do K; Shih J; Adler S; Kurdziel KA; Ton A; Turkbey B; Jacobs PM; Bhattacharyya S; Chen AP; Collins JM; Doroshow JH; Choyke PL; Lindenberg ML
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Mar; 44(3):500-508. PubMed ID: 27872957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [18F]-fluoroestradiol quantitative PET imaging to differentiate ER+ and ERα-knockdown breast tumors in mice.
    Paquette M; Ouellet R; Archambault M; Croteau É; Lecomte R; Bénard F
    Nucl Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 39(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 22079037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical production, stability studies and PET imaging with 16-alpha-[18F]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) in ER positive breast cancer patients.
    Kumar P; Mercer J; Doerkson C; Tonkin K; McEwan AJ
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2007; 10(2):256s-265s. PubMed ID: 17718929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Molecular imaging of breast cancer.
    Oude Munnink TH; Nagengast WB; Brouwers AH; Schröder CP; Hospers GA; Lub-de Hooge MN; van der Wall E; van Diest PJ; de Vries EG
    Breast; 2009 Oct; 18 Suppl 3():S66-73. PubMed ID: 19914546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diffuse bilateral
    Phillips EF; Karak PK
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Dec; 54(4):726-731. PubMed ID: 37620179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30.
    Liu C; Gong C; Liu S; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Xu X; Yuan H; Wang B; Yang Z
    Oncologist; 2019 Dec; 24(12):e1277-e1285. PubMed ID: 31337657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. PET-based estradiol challenge as a predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Dehdashti F; Mortimer JE; Trinkaus K; Naughton MJ; Ellis M; Katzenellenbogen JA; Welch MJ; Siegel BA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Feb; 113(3):509-17. PubMed ID: 18327670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Randomized Feasibility Study of
    Chae SY; Kim SB; Ahn SH; Kim HO; Yoon DH; Ahn JH; Jung KH; Han S; Oh SJ; Lee SJ; Kim HJ; Son BH; Gong G; Lee HS; Moon DH
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 27688475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33.
    Nienhuis HH; van Kruchten M; Elias SG; Glaudemans AWJM; de Vries EFJ; Bongaerts AHH; Schröder CP; de Vries EGE; Hospers GAP
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Aug; 59(8):1212-1218. PubMed ID: 29602822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34.
    O'Brien SR; Edmonds CE; Lanzo SM; Weeks JK; Mankoff DA; Pantel AR
    Radiographics; 2023 Mar; 43(3):e220143. PubMed ID: 36821506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The value of PET/CT with FES or FDG tracers in metastatic breast cancer: a computer simulation study in ER-positive patients.
    Koleva-Kolarova RG; Greuter MJ; van Kruchten M; Vermeulen KM; Feenstra T; Buskens E; Glaudemans AW; de Vries EF; de Vries EG; Hospers GA; de Bock GH
    Br J Cancer; 2015 May; 112(10):1617-25. PubMed ID: 25880006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    Kumar M; Salem K; Michel C; Jeffery JJ; Yan Y; Fowler AM
    J Nucl Med; 2019 Sep; 60(9):1247-1252. PubMed ID: 30850489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography reveals differences in pharmacodynamics of aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
    Linden HM; Kurland BF; Peterson LM; Schubert EK; Gralow JR; Specht JM; Ellis GK; Lawton TJ; Livingston RB; Petra PH; Link JM; Krohn KA; Mankoff DA
    Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Jul; 17(14):4799-805. PubMed ID: 21750198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Head-to-Head Evaluation of
    Ulaner GA; Jhaveri K; Chandarlapaty S; Hatzoglou V; Riedl CC; Lewis JS; Mauguen A
    J Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 62(3):326-331. PubMed ID: 32680923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical Potential of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Imaging.
    Linden HM; Peterson LM; Fowler AM
    PET Clin; 2018 Jul; 13(3):415-422. PubMed ID: 30100079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Between-patient and within-patient (site-to-site) variability in estrogen receptor binding, measured in vivo by 18F-fluoroestradiol PET.
    Kurland BF; Peterson LM; Lee JH; Linden HM; Schubert EK; Dunnwald LK; Link JM; Krohn KA; Mankoff DA
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1541-9. PubMed ID: 21903739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.