214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36243781)
1. Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Oakley C; Willems JH; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek P; Rozell J; Marwin S; Schwarzkopf R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1537-1547. PubMed ID: 36243781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mid term outcomes of a novel metaphyseal porous titanium cone in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Anil U; van Hellemondt G; Gupta S; Willems J; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA; Lutes WB; Schwarzkopf R
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2023 Nov; 46():102282. PubMed ID: 38196965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE
Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of porous custom-made cones for meta-diaphyseal bone defects reconstruction in knee revision surgery: a clinical and biomechanical analysis.
Burastero G; Pianigiani S; Zanvettor C; Cavagnaro L; Chiarlone F; Innocenti B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Dec; 140(12):2041-2055. PubMed ID: 33170352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic and clinical analysis of a Porous-coated metaphyseal cone for revision total Knee arthroplasty.
Guntin J; Bartosiak KA; Della Valle CJ; Patel A; Gerlinger TL; Nam D
Knee; 2022 Aug; 37():162-170. PubMed ID: 35803170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of a Three-Dimensional Printed Metaphyseal Cone in the Setting of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Monárrez R; Bains SS; Chen Z; Sax OC; Salib CG; Mont MA; Delanois RE
J Knee Surg; 2022 Dec; 35(14):1540-1543. PubMed ID: 36538941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.
Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is hybrid fixation in revision TKA using LCCK prostheses reliable?
Laudren A; Delacroix R; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 109(5):103583. PubMed ID: 36878283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tibial metaphyseal cones combined with short stems perform as well as long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Batinica B; Bolam SM; D'Arcy M; Zhu M; Monk AP; Munro JT
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Sep; 92(9):2254-2260. PubMed ID: 35754371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic Cone Zone Classification of Metaphyseal Cone Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Beaver WB; Fehring TK; Otero JE
Arthroplast Today; 2024 Feb; 25():101271. PubMed ID: 38304246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
