318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36247843)
21. Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: A preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT.
Ruhlmann V; Ruhlmann M; Bellendorf A; Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Grafe H; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Umutlu L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 27776644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and
Lee SY; Jee WH; Yoo IR; Jung JY; Im SA; Chung YG; Kang JH
Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20181051. PubMed ID: 31322913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma.
Westerland O; Amlani A; Kelly-Morland C; Fraczek M; Bailey K; Gleeson M; El-Najjar I; Streetly M; Bassett P; Cook GJR; Goh V;
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2558-2565. PubMed ID: 33469686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR replace sentinel lymph node resection in malignant melanoma?
Schaarschmidt BM; Grueneisen J; Stebner V; Klode J; Stoffels I; Umutlu L; Schadendorf D; Heusch P; Antoch G; Pöppel TD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2093-2102. PubMed ID: 29876618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone metastases with "false negative" findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with angiosarcoma: A case series with literature review.
Ariga A; Matsumoto S; Tanizawa T; Hayakawa K; Minami Y; Saito M; Kurosawa N; Yamashita K; Terauchi T; Ae K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jul; 102(28):e34196. PubMed ID: 37443509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients.
Bruckmann NM; Kirchner J; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Seifert R; Herrmann K; Bittner AK; Hoffmann O; Mohrmann S; Antke C; Schimmöller L; Ingenwerth M; Breuckmann K; Stang A; Buchbender C; Antoch G; Sawicki LM
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8714-8724. PubMed ID: 33912991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Whole-body MRI, FDG-PET/CT, and bone marrow biopsy, for the assessment of bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Albano D; Patti C; Lagalla R; Midiri M; Galia M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 27603267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection of the Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases: Is It Feasible to Compare 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and 99mTc-methyl Diphosphonate Bone Scintigraphy?
Pietrzak AK; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Urol J; 2018 Sep; 15(5):242-247. PubMed ID: 29681049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer.
Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Ytre-Hauge S; Salvesen Ø; Trovik J; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 32034487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Whole-body [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT in the assessment of bone lesions in oncological patients: initial results.
Beiderwellen K; Huebner M; Heusch P; Grueneisen J; Ruhlmann V; Nensa F; Kuehl H; Umutlu L; Rosenbaum-Krumme S; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2014 Aug; 24(8):2023-30. PubMed ID: 24907940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma.
Mesguich C; Hulin C; Latrabe V; Lascaux A; Bordenave L; Hindié E; Marit G
Ann Hematol; 2020 Dec; 99(12):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32951093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Significance of hormone receptor status in comparison of 18F -FDG-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for evaluating bone metastases in patients with breast cancer: single center experience.
Teke F; Teke M; Inal A; Kaplan MA; Kucukoner M; Aksu R; Urakci Z; Tasdemir B; Isikdogan A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):387-91. PubMed ID: 25640386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Whole-Body [
Berzaczy D; Fueger B; Hoeller C; Haug AR; Staudenherz A; Berzaczy G; Weber M; Mayerhoefer ME
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Jun; 22(3):739-744. PubMed ID: 31363965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography.
Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Umutlu L; Koeninger A; Freudenberg LS; Hauth EA; Kimmig KR; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
J Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 49(8):1215-22. PubMed ID: 18632831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of
Elmanzalawy A; Vali R; Chavhan GB; Gupta AA; Omarkhail Y; Amirabadi A; Shammas A
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Feb; 50(2):252-260. PubMed ID: 31628508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET.
Daldrup-Link HE; Franzius C; Link TM; Laukamp D; Sciuk J; Jürgens H; Schober O; Rummeny EJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 11418435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effectiveness of 18F-FDG-PET/CT vs Bone Scintigraphy in Treatment Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Al-Muqbel KM; Yaghan RJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(21):e3753. PubMed ID: 27227942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients affected by bone metastases from breast cancer in comparison with 18F-NaF PET/CT.
Piccardo A; Puntoni M; Morbelli S; Massollo M; Bongioanni F; Paparo F; Altrinetti V; Gonella R; Gennari A; Iacozzi M; Sambuceti G; DeCensi A
Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(4):163-72. PubMed ID: 26165806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
